Ordinary Meeting - 19 February 2026
Date: Thursday, 19 February 2026 at 10:00AM
Location: Noosa Shire Council Chambers , 9 Pelican Street , Tewantin , QLD 4565 , Australia
Organiser: Noosa Shire Council
Duration: 01:21:31
Synopsis: First Point SMP section passed amid debate, 25 affordable rentals approved, Composting ECI advanced, Climate resilience actions noted, Budget adopted, Landslide contract awarded.
Meeting Attendees
Councillors
Frank Wilkie Karen Finzel Jessica Phillips Amelia Lorentson Brian Stockwell Tom Wegener Nicola Wilson Executive Officers
Chief Executive Officer Larry Sengstock Director Community Services Kerri Contini Director Corporate Services Margaret Gatt Director Development & Regulation Richard MacGillivray Director Infrastructure Services Shaun Walsh Director Strategy And Environment Anita Lakeland AI-Generated Meeting Insight
Key Decisions & Discussions Amelia Lorentson: Motion carried (as amended) to include a dedicated First Point section in the forthcoming Surf Management Plan, with work to be considered alongside all Destination Management Plan actions and subject to funding (Item 10.1; 28:44–33:07; 43:54–48:01). Affordable housing: Approval of MCU25/0118 for 25 small affordable rental dwellings at 64 Lake Macdonald Dr, Cooroy under conditions (Item 11.3.1). Bounce Hostel: Approved “Other Change” to add Food and Drink Outlet; conditions 2, 4, 65 amended; prior operations showed no unreasonable impacts (Item 11.1.2). Commercial use of community land: Amended policy adopted; report on high-use permits tender outcomes due before current permits expire 30 June 2026 (Item 11.1.1). Environment grants: Multi‑year Environment Collaboration and Alliance Grants advertising delayed 12 months; one‑year bridging grants to current recipients if needed (Item 11.1.5). Climate resilience: Noted actions from “Cascading Climate Risks from Critical Infrastructure Failure” incl. LDCC/Depot upgrades, governance, data systems, and SCC partnership; to inform 26/27 budget bids (Item 11.1.6). Annual Report 2024–25 adopted, including audited financial statements (Item 11.2.1). Councillor remuneration: 3.25% increase for Mayor/Deputy/Councillors effective 1 July 2026 (Item 11.2.2). DRFA procurement: CEO delegated authority to execute/amend administer DRFA reconstruction contracts in 2026–27 beyond general financial delegation; PCAWT to advise (Item 11.2.3). Composting facility: Orez Solutions Pty Ltd selected for ECI up to $1.1m ex GST; any later D&C award requires separate Council decision (Item 11.2.5). Budget Review 2 approved; Financial Performance Jan 2026 noted; Capital Program status noted with correction (Items 11.3.2–11.3.4; 11.2.4). Major Events: Approved 2026–27 sponsorships up to $230k, subject to budget; new Sustainable Events Strategy under development (Item 11.3.6; Confid. s254D(3) LG Reg 2012). Confidential contract award: Sunshine Creek Landslide stabilisation to Sunshine Civil Solutions Pty Ltd for $2,492,858.96 ex GST; CEO delegated to administer and vary up to 17.57% of project budget (Items 13.1; 56:42–01:21:06). Contentious / Transparency Matters Brian Stockwell: Opposed First Point motion as “queue jumping” DMP actions and pre‑empting scope before stakeholder input; cited need for heritage studies and equity across Shire (19:30–24:30). Nicola Wilson: Queried wording “prioritising… alongside” as contradictory; led to amendment removing “prioritising” (31:07–32:49). Jessica Phillips: Supported motion citing councillor duty to reflect community interests despite process concerns; points of order raised during debate (33:58–35:46; 34:17–34:32). Karen Finzel: Supported intent but raised equity and internal process capacity concerns (35:49–37:32). Frank Wilkie: Brokered amendment clarifying SMP is one of many DMP actions, considered via budget; amendment passed 4–3 (28:44–33:07; 43:01–43:25). Anita Lakeland: On public question, confirmed Mayor’s “another 60 dwellings” remark relied on internal planning advice only; no specific studies; future uses to consider broader values and community consultation (8.2; 04:38–05:23). Legal / Risk Conflict management: Council resolved under s150ES Local Government Act 2009 that Amelia Lorentson could participate/vote on policy (not tender) despite declarable interests (Item 11.1.1; 49:30–51:42). Confidentiality: Meeting closed under s254J(3)(g) LG Reg 2012 to discuss CN25253 contract; reopened then resolved award and CEO delegations (Item 13.1; 56:42–01:21:06). Delegations: DRFA reconstruction CEO delegation under s257(1) LGA 2009 not limited by general financial delegation; PCAWT to advise—heightened probity needs (Item 11.2.3). Planning Act compliance: Reports for MCU changes noted as provided in accordance with s63(5) Planning Act 2016 (Items 11.1.2; 11.3.1). Events funding: Recommendations contained confidential attachment under s254D(3) LG Reg 2012 (Item 11.3.6). Public safety duty: Cooroy Mountain Rd questions answered—no immediate defects, cyclical maintenance; upgrades prioritised by risk factors; consider sectional upgrades—mitigates liability posture while not committing capex (8.1; 01:47–03:40). Planning, Development & Housing 64 Lake Macdonald Dr: 25 affordable rentals approved; prior Mayor comment of “potentially another 60 dwellings” rests on internal advice and a Jan 23, 2025 resolution requiring evaluation of open space, heritage, community uses, amenity, with consultation (Item 11.3.1; 8.2; 04:38–05:23). Bounce Hostel: Food & Drink Outlet reinstatement endorsed as reasonable extension to preferred Visitor Accommodation use; reflects Noosa Plan 2006/2020 intent (Item 11.1.2). Environmental Concerns & Coastal Management Amelia Lorentson: Argued First Point’s unique surf/heritage values, vulnerability to sand pumping/coastal works; advocated SMP section, monitoring, triggers, and exploring local/state heritage listing (10:36–19:11). Kim Rawlings: Heritage program overview: completed audit of built heritage register; next stage community consultation; flagged future scenic amenity overlay work incl. Noosa Head precinct for further assessment (26:50–28:44). ALGA motions endorsed: microplastics reduction; recycled water for firefighting; emergency medical workforce; cyber/fraud/info‑sharing; youth employment in LG; C&D waste recovery (Item 11.3.5). Composting facility progression via ECI signalled organics diversion priority and staged probity (Item 11.2.5). Transport & Infrastructure Shaun Walsh: Cooroy Mountain Rd: 200 km unsealed network; current inspections show no urgent defects; risk‑based prioritisation; sectional upgrades more cost‑effective (8.1; 01:47–03:40). Sunshine Creek Landslide: $2.49m stabilisation works awarded; CEO empowered to vary up to 17.57%—manage geotechnical unknowns within set cap (Item 13.1). Conflicts of Interest Amelia Lorentson: Declared interests (surf lessons; children’s prior employment/club coaching by tender applicants) on Commercial High Use Permits policy; permitted to participate/vote as matter was policy, not a tender (Item 11.1.1; 49:30–51:42).
Official Meeting Minutes
MINUTES Ordinary Meeting Thursday, 19 February 2026 10:00 AM Council Chambers, 9 Pelican Street, Tewantin Crs Frank Wilkie (Chair), Karen Finzel, Amelia Lorentson, Jessica Phillips, Brian Stockwell, Tom Wegener, Nicola Wilson “Noosa Shire – different by nature” ORDINARY MEETING MINUTES 19 FEBRUARY 2026 1 DECLARATION OF OPENING The meeting was declared open at 10.00am. 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF COUNTRY Noosa Council respectfully acknowledges the Traditional Custodians of the lands and waters of the Noosa area, the Kabi Kabi people, and pays respect to their Elders, past, present and emerging. 3 ATTENDANCE & APOLOGIES COUNCILLORS Cr Frank Wilkie (Chair) Cr Karen Finzel (via Microsoft Teams) Cr Jessica Phillips Cr Amelia Lorentson Cr Brian Stockwell Cr Tom Wegener (via Microsoft Teams) Cr Nicola Wilson (via Microsoft Teams) EXECUTIVE Chief Executive Officer Larry Sengstock Director Community Services Kerri Contini Acting Director Corporate Services Margaret Gatt Director Development & Regulation Richard MacGillivray Director Infrastructure Services Shaun Walsh Acting Director Strategy and Environment Anita Lakeland 4 CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES 4.1 ORDINARY MEETING MINUTES 22 JANUARY 2026 Council Resolution Moved: Cr Amelia Lorentson Seconded: Cr Brian Stockwell That the Minutes of the Ordinary Meeting held on 22 January 2026 be received and confirmed. Carried. For: Cr Frank Wilkie, Cr Karen Finzel, Cr Jessica Phillips, Cr Amelia Lorentson, Cr Brian Stockwell, Cr Tom Wegener, Cr Nicola Wilson Against: None 5 PETITIONS Nil. 6. PRESENTATIONS Nil. ORDINARY MEETING MINUTES 19 FEBRUARY 2026 7. DEPUTATIONS Nil. 8. PUBLIC QUESTION TIME 8.1 ANDY TAYLOR QUESTION 1 With consideration to the previously provided engineer's report for the gravel road section of Cooroy Mountain Road does Noosa Council intend to allocate any funds to the repair of the gravel road section of Cooroy Mountain Road in the 2026-2027 year budget? RESPONSE PROVIDED BY SHAUN WALSH, DIRECTOR INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES Budget submissions for capital expenditure for the 26/27 Financial Year are currently being prepared, so at this stage it is not possible to determine if capital funding will be allocated to Cooroy Mountain Road in the 2026/27 financial year. The engineering report presented is noted and the request for sealing the remaining section of Cooroy Mountain Road will be considered along with other similar requests on other parts of the unsealed road network. Council maintains approximately 200km of unsealed roads across the region and prioritisation for upgrades to gravel roads considers many factors such as vehicle type and volumes, average speeds, crash history, road geometry, road function and road performance. Council also undertakes maintenance in the form of grading, pavement patching, drainage works and vegetation management. QUESTION 2 Given the confirmed risk as outlined in the provided independent engineer's report for the gravel road section of Cooroy Mountain Road can council confirm the current priority ranking of the gravel road section of Cooroy Mountain Road for repair? RESPONSE PROVIDED BY SHAUN WALSH, DIRECTOR INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES Council notes the engineers report and confirms the road has been inspected by experienced engineering officers. There are no immediate defects requiring urgent repair, but it is noted that the road does require all users to drive to conditions, consistent with all unsealed roads in the Shire. Council maintains its unsealed road network on a cyclical maintenance program for production and cost efficiencies in accordance with adopted service standards. Requests for upgrade are prioritised as outlined previously. It is noted that sectional upgrades, as opposed to complete length upgrade, provides a more cost-effective treatment of specific hazards for any future upgrade works. ORDINARY MEETING MINUTES 19 FEBRUARY 2026 8.2 PAT SPICER QUESTION 1 What specific reports, studies, or expert advice did Council rely on when Mayor Wilkie announced on 1 October 2025 that, after 25 units are built at 64 Lake Macdonald Drive, the site could “support potentially another 60 dwellings”, across the two remaining lots? RESPONSE PROVIDED BY ANITA LAKELAND, ACTING DIRECTOR STRATEGY AND ENVIRONMENT The reference made in Mayor Wilkie's statement on 1 October 2025 to the site “supporting potentially another 60 dwellings” was based on advice provided by Council’s expert planning staff. No specific reports or studies were undertaken. In estimating the potential for 60 dwellings, Council’s planning staff took into account the Council resolution of 23 January 2025. This resolution requires that any process considering future uses of the remaining two sites must evaluate not only housing options, but also open space, cultural heritage, community uses, landscape and amenity, and other relevant land use planning matters. The process will involve community consultation. The meeting adjourned at 10.05am. The meeting resumed at 10.10am. 9 MAYORAL MINUTES Nil. 10 NOTIFIED MOTIONS 10.1 PROTECTING FIRST POINT, NOOSA HEADS The following material was presented to the meeting in relation to this item: Cr Lorentson – refer to: 2026-02-19 Attachment 1 to the Ordinary Meeting Minutes dated 19 February 2026 - Notice of Motion Item 10.1 - further Councillor comment Motion Moved: Cr Amelia Lorentson Seconded: Cr Jessica Phillips That Council: A. Include a dedicated section for First Point within the proposed Surf Management Plan (SMP) to recognise its unique significance and ensure its values are formally considered in coastal management; and B. Identify any resourcing or funding requirements and, as part of upcoming budget deliberations, consider prioritising this work, noting that any action will be subject to funding availability. Amendment Moved: Cr Frank Wilkie Seconded: Cr Karen Finzel That Item A and B be amended to read: A. Include a dedicated section for First Point within the proposed Surf Management Plan ORDINARY MEETING MINUTES 19 FEBRUARY 2026 (SMP) to recognise its unique significance and ensure its values are formally considered in coastal management, noting that the Surf Management Plan is one of many actions identified for Council consideration under the Destination Management Plan; and B. Identify any resourcing or funding requirements and, as part of upcoming budget deliberations, consider this work alongside all other actions, noting that any action will be subject to funding availability. Carried. For: Cr Frank Wilkie, Cr Jessica Phillips, Cr Amelia Lorentson, Cr Tom Wegener Against: Cr Karen Finzel, Cr Brian Stockwell, Cr Nicola Wilson Council Resolution Moved: Cr Amelia Lorentson Seconded: Cr Jessica Phillips That Council A. Include a dedicated section for First Point within the proposed Surf Management Plan (SMP) to recognise its unique significance and ensure its values are formally considered in coastal management, noting that the Surf Management Plan is one of many actions identified for council consideration under the Destination Management Plan; and B. Identify any resourcing or funding requirements and, as part of upcoming budget deliberations, consider this work alongside all other actions, noting that any action will be subject to funding availability. Carried. For: Cr Frank Wilkie, Cr Jessica Phillips, Cr Amelia Lorentson, Cr Tom Wegener Against: Cr Karen Finzel, Cr Brian Stockwell, Cr Nicola Wilson 11. CONSIDERATION OF COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS 11.1 PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS DATED 10 FEBRUARY 2026 11.1.1. COMMERCIAL USE OF COMMUNITY LAND POLICY AMENDMENTS AND UPCOMING TENDER PROCESS Cr Amelia Lorentson "In accordance with Chapter 5B of the Local Government Act 2009 I inform the meeting that I have a declarable conflict of interest for Item 11.1.1 - COMMERCIAL USE OF COMMUNITY LAND POLICY AMENDMENTS AND UPCOMING TENDER PROCESS on this agenda as I take weekly surfing lessons with Josh Constable who is an applicant in the Upcoming Commercial High Use Tender Process and as my children have previously worked (over 16-18 months ago) for Dean Brady who is an applicant in the Upcoming Commercial High Use Tender Process and my children are also members of Noosa Board Riders Assoc/Club where they are coached by Dean Brady (also an applicant in the tender). I request to stay in the meeting as the report is a policy document not a tender document." ORDINARY MEETING MINUTES 19 FEBRUARY 2026 Council Resolution Moved: Cr Brian Stockwell Seconded: Cr Jessica Phillips That Council note the declarable conflict of interest by Cr Amelia Lorentson and determine that in accordance with s150ES of the Local Government Act 2009, and having considered the Councillor's conflict of interest as described, it is decided that Cr Amelia Lorentson may participate and vote on this matter as Council believes that Cr Lorentson can make an impartial decision in the public interest. Carried. For: Cr Frank Wilkie, Cr Karen Finzel, Cr Jessica Phillips, Cr Amelia Lorentson, Cr Brian Stockwell, Cr Tom Wegener, Cr Nicola Wilson Against: None Cr Amelia Lorentson having declared a conflict of interest was not eligible to vote. Council Resolution Moved: Cr Brian Stockwell Seconded: Cr Jessica Phillips That Council A. Note the report by the Property Advisor to the General Committee dated 19 January 2026 regarding the Commercial Use of Community Land Policy Amendment and Upcoming Tender Process; B. Adopt the amended Commercial Use of Community Land Policy included as Attachment 2; and C. Note a further report detailing the outcomes of the Commercial High Use Permits tender process will be presented to Council prior to the expiry of existing permits on 30 June 2026. Carried. For: Cr Frank Wilkie, Cr Karen Finzel, Cr Jessica Phillips, Cr Amelia Lorentson, Cr Brian Stockwell, Cr Tom Wegener, Cr Nicola Wilson Against: None 11.1.2. MCU18/0102.03 - APPLICATION FOR OTHER CHANGE TO DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL FOR BOUNCE HOSTEL, FOOD & DRINK OUTLET AT 14-16 MARY ST, NOOSAVILLE That Council note the report by the Manger Development Assessment to the Planning & Environment Committee Meeting dated 10 February 2026 regarding application MCU18/0102.03 for an Other Change to include a Food and Drink Outlet to Development Approval for Visitor Accommodation Type 4 – Conventional situated at 16 Mary Street Noosaville and: A. Approve the Other Change to include the Food and Drink Outlet; B. Amend Conditions 2, 4 and 65 outlined in Attachment 1. C. Note the report is provided in accordance with Section 63(5) of the Planning Act 2016. D. Find the following matters relevant to the assessment and sufficient reason to approve the application: ORDINARY MEETING MINUTES 19 FEBRUARY 2026 1. The use has previously operated from the site and demonstrated that it does not result in unreasonable impacts on the surrounding area. 2. The existing backpackers was approved based on the site being specifically identified for the Visitor Accommodation (Type 4 Conventional) use under the Noosa Plan 2006 which is also reflected in the Noosa Plan 2020 which facilities Short Term Accommodation on the site. The inclusion of a Food and Drink Outlet associated with this land use is a reasonable and practical extension of the preferred existing land use. 11.1.3. MCU25/0118 - APPLICATION FOR MATERIAL CHANGE OF USE FOR MULITIPLE DWELLING - AFFORDABLE RENTAL PREMISES (25 X SMALL DWELLINGS) AT 64 LAKE MACDONALD DRIVE, COOROY That Planning & Environment Committee Agenda Item 7.3 be referred to the General Committee Meeting 16 February 2026 due to the significance of the issue. 11.1.4. PLANNING APPLICATIONS DECIDED BY DELEGATED AUTHORITY – DECEMBER 2025 That Council note the report by the Development Assessment Manager to the Planning and Environment Committee Meeting dated 10 February 2026 regarding applications that have been decided by delegated authority for December 2025 as provided at Attachment 1 to the Report. 11.1.5. MULTI-YEAR ENVIRONMENT COLLABORATION GRANTS AND ORGANISATIONAL ALLIANCE GRANTS PROPOSED RESCHEDULE That Council A. Note the report by the Environmental Services Manager to the Planning & Environment Committee dated 10 February 2026 regarding Multi-year Environment Grants Proposed Reschedule; B. Delay the advertising and distribution of Multi-year Environmental Collaboration Grants and Environment Organisation Alliance Grants for 12 months; and C. Provide a one-year bridging grant to the current MEC and Alliance recipients based on current milestones and program objectives if appropriate and if required by the receiving organisation. 11.1.6. CASCADING CLIMATE RISKS FROM CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE FAILURE PROJECT REPORT That Council A. Note the report by the Program Lead - Climate Adaptation to the Planning & Environment Committee Meeting dated 10 February 2026; and B. Note the priority actions to implement the key findings from the project, as listed below: i. Implementation of adaptation and resilience measures for the Local Disaster Coordination Centre (LDCC) and Noosaville Depot. ii. Establishment of management solutions that improve corporate policies, systems and procedures to build resilience to critical infrastructure failure and cascading climate risks. ORDINARY MEETING MINUTES 19 FEBRUARY 2026 iii. Establishment of required organisational governance to drive a holistic climate adaptation response to compounding critical infrastructure failure. iv. Establishment of internal data collection to inform future investigations and improve Council’s ability to address the consequences of critical infrastructure failure. v. Continued engagement with critical infrastructure and critical service providers through the continuation of the Stakeholder Reference Group. vi. Continued partnership with the Sunshine Coast Council to build on findings and identify joint solutions to manage the cascading impacts of critical infrastructure failure. C. Note the recommendations of the study will be used to inform budget submission for Council consideration for the 26/27 FY. 11.1.7. PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE RECOMENDATIONS ENBLOC Council Resolution Moved: Cr Amelia Lorentson Seconded: Cr Karen Finzel That the Recommendations of the Planning & Environment Committee meeting dated 10 February 2026 be received and adopted except where dealt with by separate resolution. Carried. For: Cr Frank Wilkie, Cr Karen Finzel, Cr Jessica Phillips, Cr Amelia Lorentson, Cr Brian Stockwell, Cr Tom Wegener, Cr Nicola Wilson Against: None 11.2 SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS DATED 10 FEBRUARY 2026 11.2.1. NOOSA SHIRE COUNCIL ANNUAL REPORT 2024 - 2025 That Council: A. Note the report by the Governance Manager to the Services and Organisation Committee meeting dated 10 February 2026 regarding corporate reporting. B. Adopt the Noosa Shire Council 2024 - 2025 Annual Report, which incorporates the audited Financial Statements for 2024 - 2025 financial year, as presented in Attachment 1. C. Authorise the Chief Executive Officer to make any required minor amendments to the document prior to publication. ORDINARY MEETING MINUTES 19 FEBRUARY 2026 11.2.2. COUNCILLOR REMUNERATION UPDATE That Council: A. Note the report by the People & Culture Manager to the Services & Organisation Committee dated 10 February 2026 regarding the Local Government Remuneration Commission Annual Report 2025; and B. Approves the remuneration increase of 3.25% for Mayor, Deputy Mayor and Councillors effective from 1 July 2026. 11.2.3. SOURCING RECOMMENDATION: DRFA 2025 - RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT PROCUREMENT STRATEGY That Council A. Note the report by the Disaster Reconstruction Coordinator to the Services and Organisation Committee Meeting dated 10 February 2026 regarding contracts applicable to the execution of work related to Disaster Reconstruction B. Pursuant to section 257 (1) of the Local Government Act 2009, delegate to the Chief Executive Officer the power to negotiate, finalise, execute, amend and administer contracts on behalf of Council that are directly related to the construction for the repair, reconstruction or betterment of infrastructure. Specifically, those contracts approved by QRA for reconstruction funding under the DRFA program, for work that commences in the 2026 and 2027 calendar years. C. Resolve that the delegation in Item B above is not limited by any general financial delegations that apply to exercising the Chief Executive Officer’s power and may be exercised to bind Council to a contract sum that exceeds the Chief Executive Officer's general financial delegation; and D. Resolve to convene the Procurement Contracts Assessment Working Team (PCAWT) to provide advice to the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) in the exercise of the CEO’s delegation pursuant to Item B above. 11.2.4. CAPITAL PROGRAM 2025 - 2026 DELIVERY STATUS REPORT That Council A. Note the report by the Principal Infrastructure Planner to the Services & Organisation Committee Meeting, 10 February 2026, providing an update on the 2025/26 Capital Works Program as at 31 December 2025. B. Note the correction of the error in Table 1 – Capital Finance data as at 31 December 2025 Actual Year to Date to read $12,400,000. 11.2.5. CN24799 COMPOSTING EXPRESSION OF INTEREST (EOI) OUTCOME AND RECOMMENDATION TO COMMENCE EARLY CONTRACTOR INVOLVEMENT (ECI) That Council: A. Note the report by the Waste Manager to the Services & Organisation Committee dated 10 February 2026 regarding the Composting Facility procurement process; B. Approve the selection of Orez Solutions Pty Ltd as the successful respondent to Request for Tender CN24799 (the Procurement Process) for a contract amount of no greater than $1,100,000 (excluding GST); ORDINARY MEETING MINUTES 19 FEBRUARY 2026 C. Authorise the CEO the power to negotiate, finalise and execute an early contractor involvement contract (ECI Contract) with the successful respondent on behalf of Council, and take any other steps necessary or incidental to finalising the Procurement Process (including notifying any unsuccessful tenderers), pursuant to section 257(1) of the Local Government Act 2009; D. Note that: a. in the event an ECI Contract is entered into, Council intends to enter into a design and construct contract (D&C Contract) pursuant to the ECI Contract at a later stage; b. the award of the D&C contract is subject to and conditional upon a further Council resolution, and a report will be presented to Council for a decision about any D&C Contract in due course. 11.2.6. SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS ENBLOC Council Resolution Moved: Cr Jessica Phillips Seconded: Cr Nicola Wilson That the Recommendations of the Services & Organisation Committee meeting dated 10 February 2026 be received and adopted. Carried. For: Cr Frank Wilkie, Cr Karen Finzel, Cr Jessica Phillips, Cr Amelia Lorentson, Cr Brian Stockwell, Cr Tom Wegener, Cr Nicola Wilson Against: None 11.3 GENERAL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS DATED 16 FEBRUARY 2026 11.3.1. MCU25/0118 - APPLICATION FOR MATERIAL CHANGE OF USE FOR MULITIPLE DWELLING - AFFORDABLE RENTAL PREMISES (25 X SMALL DWELLINGS) AT 64 LAKE MACDONALD DRIVE, COOROY (REFERRED FROM PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE DATED 10 FEBRUARY 2026 - ITEM 7.3) That Council A. Note the report by the Senior Development Planner to the Planning and Environment Committee Meeting dated 10 February 2026 regarding application MCU25/0118 for a Development Permit for Material Change of Use - Multiple dwelling – Affordable Rental Premises (25 x small dwellings) situated at 64 Lake Macdonald Drive Cooroy; B. Approve the application in accordance with the proposed conditions outlined in Attachment 1; and C. Note the report is provided in accordance with Section 63(5) of the Planning Act 2016. ORDINARY MEETING MINUTES 19 FEBRUARY 2026 11.3.2. FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE REPORT - JANUARY 2026 That Council note the report by the Revenue Services Manager and Financial Services Manager (Acting) to the General Committee dated 16 February 2026 regarding Council's financial performance to 31 January 2026. 11.3.3. BUDGET REVIEW 2 - 2026 That Council A. Note the report by the Revenue Services Manager and Financial Services Manager (Acting) to the General Committee dated 16 February 2026 regarding Budget Review 2 for the 2025/26 Financial year; and B. Approve the proposed amendments to the 2025/26 Budget and Long-Term Forecast as outlined in Attachments 1 to 7 to the report. 11.3.4. OPERATIONAL PLAN 2025-2026 Q2 QUARTERLY REPORTING That Council A. Note the report by the Executive Officer to the General Committee dated 16 February 2026 regarding the Operational Plan 2025-2026; B. Note the progress report for Quarter 2 (FY25/26) of the Operational Plan 20252026 provided as Attachment 1; and C. Note the status of Council's Operational Key Performance Measures for Quarter 2 (FY25/26) provided as Attachment 2. 11.3.5. PROPOSED MOTIONS FOR SUBMISSION TO ALGA NATIONAL GENERAL ASSEMBLY 2026 That Council note the report by the Chief Executive Officer to the Services & Organisation Committee Meeting dated 10 February 2026 regarding motions to the Australian Local Government Association (ALGA) National General Assembly (NGA) 2026 and A. Approve the following motions to be submitted to the ALGA NGA 2026: 1. Motion #1 titled: "Reducing Microplastics in Waterways" (as provided at Attachment 1), initiated by Cr Lorentson; 2. Motion #2 titled: "Recycled Water for Emergency Firefighting" (as provided at Attachment 2), initiated by Cr Lorentson; 3. Motion #3 titled: "Emergency Medical Workforce Support" (as provided at Attachment 3), initiated by Cr Lorentson; 4. Motion #4 titled: "Internal Cyber Security, Fraud Controls and Information Sharing in Local Government" (as provided at Attachment 4), initiated by Cr Lorentson; 5. Motion #5 titled: "National Youth Employment & Training Pathways in Local Government" (as provided at Attachment 5), initiated by Cr Lorentson; 6. Motion #6 titled: "National Framework to Improve Construction and Demolition Waste Recovery" (as provided at Attachment 6), initiated by Cr Lorentson; B. Approve Cr Lorentson and Cr Wilson to attend under the Councillors' Expenses Reimbursement and Provision of Facilities Policy (Councillors' Mandatory Representation funding - Item 2.1) and present the motions at the National General Assembly, should they wish to attend. ORDINARY MEETING MINUTES 19 FEBRUARY 2026 11.3.6. MAJOR EVENT FUNDING APPROVALS That Council A. Note the report by the Manager Economic Development and Destination Management to the General Committee dated 16 February 2026; B. Approve the Major Event Sponsorship Funding for a transition year being 2026-27 as outlined in Attachment 1 - Major Event Funding Recommendations (Confidential IAW with S 254D(3) of the LG Reg 2012) subject to sufficient funds totalling $230,000 being allocated in the adopted 2026-27 Council budget; and C. Note that the new Noosa Sustainable Events Strategy, Policy and Assessment criteria are under development and will guide future processes. 11.3.7. GENERAL COMMITTEE RECOMENDATIONS ENBLOC Council Resolution Moved: Cr Karen Finzel Seconded: Cr Brian Stockwell That the Recommendations of the General Committee meeting dated 16 February 2026 be received and adopted. Carried. For: Cr Frank Wilkie, Cr Karen Finzel, Cr Jessica Phillips, Cr Amelia Lorentson, Cr Brian Stockwell, Cr Tom Wegener, Cr Nicola Wilson Against: None 12 ORDINARY MEETING REPORTS Refer to Confidential Session. 13 CONFIDENTIAL SESSION 13.1 CONFIDENTIAL - NOT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE - CONTRACT NUMBER CN25253 SUNSHINE CREEK LANDSLIDE CLOSURE OF THE MEETING TO THE PUBLIC Council Resolution Moved: Cr Frank Wilkie Seconded: Cr Jessica Phillips That the meeting be closed to the public pursuant to section 254J(3)(g) of the Local Government Regulation 2012 for the purpose of discussing a contract proposed to be made by Council and in particular, the potential commercial negotiations in relation to that contract for Item 13.1 - CONTRACT NUMBER CN25253 SUNSHINE CREEK LANDSLIDE. Carried. For: Cr Frank Wilkie, Cr Karen Finzel, Cr Jessica Phillips, Cr Amelia Lorentson, Cr Brian Stockwell, Cr Tom Wegener, Cr Nicola Wilson Against: None ORDINARY MEETING MINUTES 19 FEBRUARY 2026 REOPENING OF THE MEETING TO THE PUBLIC Council Resolution Moved: Cr Brian Stockwell Seconded: Cr Karen Finzel That the meeting be re-opened to the public. Carried. For: Cr Frank Wilkie, Cr Karen Finzel, Cr Jessica Phillips, Cr Amelia Lorentson, Cr Brian Stockwell, Cr Tom Wegener, Cr Nicola Wilson Against: None Council Resolution Moved: Cr Brian Stockwell Seconded: Cr Amelia Lorentson That Council note the report by the Disaster Reconstruction Coordinator to the Ordinary Meeting dated 19 February 2026 regarding: A. Award Contract No. CN25253 for Sunshine Creek Landslide Stabilisation to Sunshine Civil Solutions Pty Ltd at a value of $2,492,858.96 (excluding GST); B. Delegate to the Chief Executive Officer the power to negotiate, finalise, execute and do all the things necessary to administer the Contract on behalf of Council; and C. Delegate to the Chief Executive Officer the power to amend the contract up to 17.57% of the budget allocated for the project. Carried. For: Cr Frank Wilkie, Cr Karen Finzel, Cr Jessica Phillips, Cr Amelia Lorentson, Cr Brian Stockwell, Cr Tom Wegener, Cr Nicola Wilson Against: None 14 NEXT MEETING The next Ordinary Meeting will be held at Council Chambers, 9 Pelican St, Tewantin on Thursday 19 March 2026 at 10.00am. 15 MEETING CLOSURE The meeting closed at 11.21am.
Meeting Transcript
Frank Wilkie 00:00.000
Good morning everybody and welcome to the ordinary meeting of the third Thursday the 19th of February 2026 declare the meeting open at 10:00am. We begin by acknowledging that we're meeting on the traditional lands and waters of the Kabi Kabi people. I pay my my respects to the elders past, present and emerging and acknowledge their recognition of us all as joint custodians and respecting and caring for this beautiful place that we all love and respecting and caring for each other. And that's it all councillors are in attendance and that councillors Wegener, councillors Finzel and councillors Wilson are online we have a couple who are ill and not not wanting to spread the love in chambers, which is very good of them. Item four is confirmation of the minutes. May I have a mover and a seconder for the minutes of the ordinary meeting? Happy to move. Thank you, Councillor O'Reilly. so I think Councillor Stockwell just shaded you, Councillor Finzel. There are no petitions, there are no presentations, we have no deputations. We have two submissions for public question time. The first application with two questions is from Mr. Andy Taylor. Mr. Taylor couldn't be here today, but Councillor Lorentson Councillor Lorentson will read his questions, which will be answered by Shaun Walsh, Director of Infrastructure Services. Amelia Lorentson 01:20.092
Question 1: With consideration to the previously provided Engineer's Report for the Gravel of Cooroy Mountain Road, does Noosa Council intend to allocate any funds to the repair of the Gravel Road section of Cooroy Mountain Road in the 2026-2027 year budget? Frank Wilkie 01:43.300
Here comes Director Walsh. Shaun Walsh 01:45.454
Thank you Andy for the question read by Councillor Lorentson. Budget submissions for the capital expenditure for the 2026-2027 financial year are currently being prepared. So at this stage it is not possible to determine if capital funding will be allocated to Cooroy Mountain Road in the 2026-2027 financial year. The engineering report presented is noted and the request for sealing the remaining section of the Cooroy Mountain Road will be considered along with other similar requests on other parts of the unsealed road network. Council maintains approximately 200km of unsealed roads across the region and prioritisation for upgrades to gravel roads considers many factors such as vehicle type of volumes, average Average speeds, crash history, road geometry, road function and road performance. Council also undertakes maintenance in the form of grading, paper patching, drainage works and vegetation management. Frank Wilkie 02:39.673
Thank you Director Walsh. Councillor Lorentson. Amelia Lorentson 02:42.359
Question 2. Given the confirmed risk as outlined in the provided independent engineer's report for the gravel road section of Cooroy Mountain Road, can Council Council confirm the current priority ranking of the gravel road section of Cooroy Mountain Road for repair? Shaun Walsh 03:00.443
Thank you for the question. Council notes the engineer's report and confirms the road has been inspected by experienced engineering officers. There are no immediate defects requiring urgent repair but it is noted that the road does require all users to drive to conditions consistent with all unsealed roads in the Shire. Council maintains its unsealed road network on a cyclical maintenance program for production and cost efficiencies in accordance with adopted service standards. Requests for upgrade are prioritised as outlined previously. It is noted that sectional upgrades as opposed to complete length upgrade provides a cost effective treatment of specific hazards for any future upgrade works. Frank Wilkie 03:40.551
Thank you Director Walsh. The next application with one question is from Mrs. Pat Spicer. Mrs. Spicer would you like to come to the lectern and read your question which will be answered by Acting Director of Strategy and Environment, Anita Lakeland. You're welcome Pat. Thank you. Pat Spicer 03:54.142
Through the Background information is the media release on the 1st of the 10th 25, the State Residential Activation Fund for Cooroy housing project. Question. What specific reports, studies or expert advice did Council rely on when Mayor Wilkie announced on the 1st of October 2025 that after 25 units are built at 64 Lake Macdonald Drive, the site could support potentially another 60 dwellings across the two remaining lots. Frank Wilkie 04:29.453
Thank you. Acting Director Anita Lakeland. Anita Lakeland 04:38.360
Thank you for your question. The reference made in Mayor Wilkie's statement on 1st of October 2025 to the site supporting potentially another 60 dwellings was based on advice provided by Council's expert planning staff. No specific reports or studies were undertaken. In estimating 60 dwellings Council's planning staff took into account the Council resolution of 23rd of January 2025. The resolution requires that any process considering future uses of the remaining two sites must evaluate not only housing options but also open space, cultural heritage, community uses, landscape and amenity and and other relevant planning matters. The process will involve community consultation. Thank you Director Lakeland. Frank Wilkie 05:23.745
Traditionally we have a ten minute adjournment here. There's only been three questions but there's been I think five minutes be enough? Okay we'll have a five minute We're back on and it was brought to my attention that we actually moved and seconded the confirmation of the minutes but we didn't actually vote on it. Those in favour of the minutes? Yes. Thank you. That's carried. Thank you. Right, well now there are no Mayoral minutes. We have one notified motion which was included in the agenda. Protecting first point, Noosa Heads, Councillor Lorentson, would you like to move your motion? Amelia Lorentson 10:38.594
I will. I'd like to move a recommendation that Council A include a dedicated section for first point within the proposed surf management its plan unique to significance recognise and ensure its values are formally considered in coastal management and b identify any resourcing or funding requirements and as part of our upcoming deliberations consider prioritising this work noting that any action will be subject to funding availability thank you Mary have a seconder for the motion please thank you Councillor Councillor first point Noosa Heads is one of Australia's most iconic and internationally recognised surf breaks and an important environmental recreational and cultural asset for both the local community and visitors. It contributes significantly to Noosa identity, its lifestyle and visitor economy. The surf break, the beach, the dunes and the adjoining foreshore operate as an interconnected coastal system. Sand movement community. Shoreline condition and coastal works in the area can directly influence wave quality, surf amenity and the health of the surrounding environment. For this reason, management decisions at first point require careful and coordinated First point forms part of the Noosa World Surfing Reserve which recognises the area's outstanding global surfing significance and provides an important stewardship and advocacy framework. Look, while World Serving... World Surfing Reserve designation confirms international recognition, it does not provide legislative or statutory protection. It does not regulate coastal works, it does not regulate sand pumping activities, pipelines, anchoring systems or other interventions that may affect wave quality, sediment dynamics or foreshore condition. As a result, first point a result, First Point remains vulnerable despite its global status. Community groups, including Saving First Point, have continually raised issues regarding sand pumping and coastal works, noting that Noosa Council has not sand in this area for many years. These concerns reflect strong and enduring community expectations that a place of such significance should be afforded more targeted and robust protection. In the absence In the absence of new state-led legislative or policy measures, there is a clear need for Council to investigate locally driven planning, coastal management, heritage mechanisms, and legal pathways to better safeguard first points. points: environmental, cultural, and recreational values including a dedicated section or first point within the proposed surf management plan which is a key deliverable of the destination management plan is a practical, low-cost and proportionate first step. It formally recognises the area's significance, improves visibility in council decision-making and provides a coordinated framework to guide future actions without committing council to immediate capital works. Council is in the final stages of updating its regional coastal process study and model in partnership with Sunshine Coast Council, the Department of Environment, Tourism, Science and Innovation and through grant funding from the National Emergency Management Agency. This critical step will enable council and evidence-based and data-driven insight into coastal processes and sand movements along Noosa coastline over time. Through the process of developing a surf management plan, council can consider a range of scalable and evidence-based options, such as stakeholder engagement or roundtables, monitoring of sand movement and surf break performance, clearer operational triggers for intervention, alignment with existing shoreline or management plans, review of sand management practices and strengthening local planning or regulatory tools and exploring heritage or other recognition mechanisms where appropriate. Local or state heritage may represent a credible pathway to formally recognise First Point's importance including its contribution to Queensland's surfing history and coastal identity. In parallel, strengthened local laws, foreshore specific protections and tailored safe sand management approaches offer practical tools to guide decision making and regulate activities and preserve the coastal and wave forming processes that underpin First Point's significance. Investigating options, resourcing and funding implications ensures Council can assess these measures in the structured and financially responsible way through the normal budget process. This motion recognises and builds on the Noosa World Surfing the Noosa World Surfing Reserve's work and advocacy in protecting Noosa world-class point breaks from Laguna Bay to North Sunshine Beach. The World Surfing Reserve with Council have scoped this surf management plan which is a key action of a destination management plan that provides expertise and guidance to ensure key surf breaks are properly considered. This motion builds on their work to date and the strong ongoing advocacy of both SAFE First Point and the Noosa World Surfing Reserve reflecting a collaborative locally led and evidence-based approach to protecting First Point for current and future generations. I do also want to table and request that the school be recognised in the motion. Just a quick overview of what makes First Point unique. And I do so because it has uniqueness and heritage significance that is probably not well known to everyone in the community and I'll just speak quickly to it before I table. First Point Noosa Heads is internationally recognised as an exceptional right-hand point break of rare geological and oceanographic quality. Comparable Comparable to only a very small number of sites globally, including Malibu, USA, it displays a mechanically consistent and highly refined wave form, ideally suited to longboard surfing, and under optimal swell conditions, high-performance shortboard surfing. Its exceptional length, shape, and rideability represent a benchmark in global Global surf quality. The waves' defining characteristics arise from the unique and enduring interaction between the granite headland of Noosa National Park, the curvature of Laguna Bay, long-established sand transport systems, and subtle marine and vegetative stabilisation processes. Together, these natural elements create a clean, peeling-away face of remarkable consistency and aesthetic distinction. These attributes have developed over geological time and are dependent on dynamic coastal processes that cannot be engineered or authentically elsewhere, contributing to the site's rarity and integrity. First Point possesses outstanding aesthetic value due to the harmonious relationship between landforms, seascape and coastal dynamics that produce one replicated. It also holds strong social and cultural significance and has played a central role in the evolution of Australian longboarding and remains deeply embedded in Noosa community identity, intergenerational traditions and surf culture. It maintains strong and ongoing associations with surfers and internationally and contributes materially to the region's tourism economy and global reputation. For these reasons, the first point may reasonably be considered to demonstrate cultural heritage significance. significance. may warrant assessment for potential listing under the Queensland Heritage Act 1992 and approach the tables to the CEO. Frank Wilkie 19:11.891
Thank you, Councillor Lorentson. Are there any questions? for Councillor Lorentson or for staff? Is there any debate on the notice of motion? Councillor Stockwell. Brian Stockwell 19:30.551
Off, no one's going to argue with the quintessential nature of First Point in terms of the shires, estates, the world's surfing history and heritage. That's not what we've been asked to consider. What we've been asked What we've been asked to consider is after five years of a strategic planning process that came up with a ten year plan for destination management, that we've been asked to prioritise one action in there and not only prioritise it, a councillor is suggesting how it's going to be formed. It's going to have a specific section in it. I was to write a course on how not to do planning 101 the process in this motion would be a good case study. We already have considered the issues around this in a range of ways. I've read you can go back to the 70s of every investigation into coastal management down on Main Beach in this area in our local history library and I've read them all. And protecting the break has been a key issue. So particularly for example when we look for several years, Council looked for several years at an artificial reef and one of the major determinants for that not proceeding was the concern that it would affect the break. If I'm going to work out and be asked to make a decision on priorities for the next budget and priorities for implementing the destination management plan, I want to make that on an informed basis, not an ad hoc basis. Want to make it so that there's just not one Councillor cherry picking one particular action and coming out and saying we should do this and we should do that. Now it doesn't lock us in to budget deliberation, but it does lock staff in to assessing this particular approach. If we are serious about this and we are serious about heritage recognition then we should do a serious approach. And that approach has already been recommended to us. We did a heritage review of our places which feed into a range of acts including amendments to the planning scheme. But importantly there was a recommendation there that there is a need to need to actually take further studies including scenic amenity landscape study to identify significant landscape views and vistas across the Shire for potential protection. It specifically mentions the Noosa Head Precinct in Appendix J. an area that requires further research and significance assessment. So we've already got recommendations in front of us to do that heritage analysis. This motion won't affect that. When we want to invest in it, it should come through If this is a new initiative and we want to say the surf management plan is one of the things we want to do in the destination management plan, then that's a new initiative that we consider during the budget process. We certainly don't want to dictate what a surf management plan is going to include before we've listened to all the stakeholders and that's what this motion does. It takes process of actually engaging people and trying to understand what's important to put in a surf management plan. So for those reasons councillors, we've been asked to adopt a very inefficient mechanism to address an issue of concern to board riders. And that issue is they're concerned that the current state of the sand on the beach is... beach is not optimal for the sort of waves that they've enjoyed over recent decades. It's a very inefficient way of raising it and therefore it's likely to be ineffective in achieving its desired outcome. I've got no problem with having consideration around increasing protections. It suggests that our coastal management framework would not consider the impact on the surf break. It's disregarding history. Now we had a previous coastal engineer here who did his postgraduate research on looking at the whole inland area, not just this area. I think it went on to be a PhD. And he was under the supervision of one of our local surfers, Professor Harvey Leon. So we've got great knowledge. But this should But this should all be going into the melting pot when we make the decision that now is the time to do the surface management plan and what the next step is in heritage protection. So by doing this, by a notice of motion, it says we're going to do it with this budget. And one of the reasons for doing it is it's got heritage significance. Can I remind councillors that during the review of the 2020 planning scheme in 2019, we had significant input from the Pomona community saying that they really want to see greater heritage protection of their So they've been waiting for six years but this one comes over the top if we agree to this motion. So councillors, this motion isn't about acknowledging what First Point is to surfing and to our community and to our heritage. It is about trying to jump the queue and I don't want to be part of it. Frank Wilkie 24:30.961
Stockwell. Councillor Nicola Wilson, do you have a question or would you like to speak? Nicola Wilson 24:37.985
Where are we in the process of surfing or developing the surf management plan? I'm assuming that this is the area we're acting in, Director? Anita Lakeland 25:02.020
Hi, thank you. SPEAKER_03 25:03.137
I don't actually have to take that on notice and come back and give a properly rounded response. That's okay? Amelia Lorentson 25:11.080
I'm happy to step in, that's okay. So first I just want to, in response to Councillor Wilson, the Noosa Council and the Noosa World Surfing Reserve have already started the scoping of the surf management plan. The World Surfing Reserve, we actually had a PhD student, Rosie Woods, who helped scope the surf management plan. I think Tom has a copy of it and he's down at the Gold Coast conference at the moment. So we're in the beginning stages. In reference to why I make the mention in the recommendation, states a... That'll be rebutting. Oh Frank Wilkie 25:50.747
Okay. But you've answered the question. Thank you very much. Thank you, councillor. other questions from the councillors? Karen Finzel 26:02.540
Yes, please. Councillor Finzel. Frank Wilkie 26:04.265
Yes, thank you. Karen Finzel 26:05.559
This is a question, I'm not sure who's in the room. Just wondering where we're at with the work regarding the natural vistas and land stacks through the heritage work coming off the back coming off the back of what Councillor Stockwell said about the community engagement for protecting our heritage. Frank Wilkie 26:28.168
Is there a director that wants to address that question? Kim Rawlings 26:50.900
Thank you councillors. So the process, the first process was to review the existing heritage register and the items on that. It was particularly focused on built heritage, doing a full audit of the items on the register and looking to see whether any whether any items that were on the register needed to be removed or whether there were additional items to be considered. That piece of work has been done in the background and is preparing for the next stage which includes community consultation. That piece of work absolutely identified both through staff and through when we did the first round of the community engagement the desire to see natural areas considered for heritage significance in particular in terms of vistas or areas that might have social significance so there's a So there's an appendix to that. It's got a considerable list of areas. Those areas require future investigation and that piece of work will take some time. But the next stage in the heritage register review is the community engagement component in terms That's correct. We've got workshops scheduled with Council next month to start to go through those changes to the proposed planning scheme and also the schedule for how we engage with the community and our Just member in terms of scenic amenity more broadly, we have had it in our forward planning program to actually look at scenic amenity views and vistas across the whole Shire as well through a potential overlay to the planning scheme which we currently don't have. Thank you. Frank Wilkie 28:44.377
Like to propose an amendment. And the amendment reads that item A and B be amended to read include a dedicated section for first point within the proposed surf management plan to recognise its unique significance and ensure its values are formally considered in coastal management, noting that surf management plan is one of many actions identified for council consideration under the destination management plan and identify any resourcing or funding requirements and as part of the upcoming budget deliberations consider prioritising this work alongside all other actions noting that any action will be subject to funding availability. I have a seconder for the you, Councillor Finzel. Councillors, I do this because I thought that there may be a question about not necessarily the value of including first point in a surf management plan, but a question around the process and how we get to that point. And I've read the notice of motion. It is very well written and it makes it in the body of the notice of motion that it would be, it's one of the actions of the destination management plan. And I inferred from that it would be considered alongside all the other actions of the destination management plan. What this amendment seeks to do is make that clear in the motion itself. And I've done that respectfully because I don't believe it's, it's, I believe it's, I believe it's within the spirit of what's intended of the, on the original notice of motion, but it just helps clarify the process and the considerations that all councillors will be part of when we come to look at the destination management plan actions. Amelia Lorentson 30:45.839
And I'll speak to it. I support the amendment and it just provides clarity again over the intent and spirit of the motion. So I thank the Mayor Wilkie for that. Also I would like to note that, I'll leave it at that. Thank you. Nicola Wilson 31:07.680
Just a question, clarity. Consider, in part B, consider prioritising this work alongside other directions. So what does that mean? Frank Wilkie 31:20.100
Well, there may be other actions that other councillors would like prioritised. So it's about considering all actions as a priority for this year's budget. Bearing in mind that the DMP, the actions, it's a ten year vision under the DMP and there will be many budgets across which We can't do it all in the one year, so it's intended to highlight the fact that councillors will be weighing up what actions they'd like to prioritise in the upcoming budget deliberation. Nicola Wilson 32:02.020
I don't think that's what it's saying there, because if you're prioritising something, you're raising it above the others, not alongside. Frank Wilkie 32:13.160
Are you wishing to- is that a question, or are you speaking to the amendment now, Councillor Wilson? Nicola Wilson 32:19.642
Would you like to- Frank Wilkie 32:21.347
Well, I'm seeking clarity, because I don't think it makes sense, because if you're prioritising something, then you can't look at it alongside, because you've already raised it above. Amelia Lorentson 32:34.960
Can I just make a possible amendment, maybe take the word prioritising out, and just make it- consider this work alongside all other actions, noting that any action will be subject to funding availability, if you're happy with that amendment. Frank Wilkie 32:49.920
I am. Councillor Wilson, will that address the point you're raising? Yes. Brian Stockwell 32:59.706
All councillors happy with changing the word, moving the word prioritising? Frank Wilkie 33:07.608
Yes. Thank you. Any other councillors wish to speak to the amendment or raise any questions about the proposed amendment? Councillor Wilson? Nicola Wilson 33:22.984
I'm just going to speak against it. I think if the scoping is still underway for the survey management plan then that's the process where this should be raised. It shouldn't need to be a separate notified motion. So if the survey management plan is still under development then why not this request just be included as part of that process? Frank Wilkie 33:56.000
Any other councillors wish to speak to the amendment? Jessica Phillips 33:58.745
I'll speak to it quickly. Councillor? I'm just listening to everyone around the table so I think for me it's just really around Local Government Act Responsibility of councillors. A councillor must represent the current and future interests of residents in a local government area. Brian Stockwell 34:17.902
Point of order. What's the point of order? debating an amendment to a motion that changed things. We're debating an amendment. Talking about general provisions is not talking to the amendment. I'd like to hear where you're going with this, Councillor, if you can get to the point, please. Jessica Phillips 34:32.744
I just want to read that sentence so I've got it right. It just encompasses, I guess there's lots of talk about notified motions and processes around how things are brought to the table. For me, it's not really about how it's brought to the table, it's just that the community sort expect us to try and put forward the things that we hear in the community. So I will support it because there's obviously a lot of body of work that's gone into it. I did sit on the... board serving reserve for that year and it was definitely topical. They brought in that young girl from the States and she did a really good thorough job on the research. She had a... was doing thesis or something on it and I know that there's a lot of body of work that's been put in, a lot of community members that have volunteered their time behind it and I think that's something that really needs to be acknowledged. They're not doing it for their own personal gain. Yes, yes they might get a great surf wave out of it, but I think it really is one of those things that people are passionate about. So yeah, I'll support the motion. I did listen to everyone around the table, but for me I just want to make sure that things continue to progress. to progress from what community are asking us to do. Thanks. Frank Wilkie 35:46.754
Councillor Finzel. Karen Finzel 35:47.838
Yes, thank you for the opportunity to speak. Thank you to all the councillors who've made comment around the table. I'd just just like to raise my concerns around equity and finding balance in process and bringing process to the table. You know, I believe across the entire Shire, all our community groups and voices are passionate about their area and where they identify with and how they want to see change come about for their local areas too. ensure that their communities thrives. I like the intent of this motion however I do have concerns around the internal process in council. I do understand that it is our role to bring the voices of community to the table but I think we have to be very careful that we've got that balance where there is that equity of voice and you know one voice you know. Doesn't override the equity throughout the Shire. So I think as we consider this what's before us today and I do acknowledge Councillor Lorentson Laurenston for the work and the well-written motion that she's put forward it's very succinct and very clear and I do support the intent of where that's coming from. My challenge around this will be that how we follow a process that provides equity and fairness around the table. Frank Wilkie 37:32.540
Can I ask a question? At any point can we come into your office and talk about situations that are raised or community concerns and come through this process and it's sort of a very open way of bringing topical matters to this table? Larry Sengstock 37:56.760
Certainly, that's the process is to come to me. I authorise whether these come to notice the motion I sign off on whether they come to this table and that is the process so Councillor Wilson Lyons did do that, came to me, we talked this through and it comes then to the table for debate and decision. So that's how it works. It is a way, our notice of motion is a way of bringing things to a higher, I guess, profile, if you like, in terms of making people aware that this is a concern of a councillor or a group in the community to come to the table and that's what it's for, and then it's up to you to debate it and decide whether it... can be absorbed into a budgeting process and has a mechanism through there which it will have based on this on this notice of motion so it's really notice of motion is just a method in my opinion a to little bring something bit to higher sort of profile if you like but we do also need to be careful that we do as Councillor Finzel said the equity side of things is important as well and that's why you're debating it today as I Thank understand you. Question to the CEO. So there's a lot of discussion at the moment about process and equity. Can you explain destination management plan that's been ratified and prioritised action was the surf management plan. Is that not equity in process? Frank Wilkie 39:29.945
I'm not going to allow that question. I'm not going to allow that question, Councillor. CEO into the debate. Amelia Lorentson 39:37.603
Can you explain in terms of hierarchy and process how the destination management plan sits in terms of actions for Larry Sengstock 39:53.475
So, certainly, so the destination management plan has a range of actions that have been put forward and it's now up to our budgeting process and and our council debate process to decide which ones of those are prioritised in the different forms, so that to me is, that's the process that we've got in play. So there is a range and yes, you're right, the surfing management plan is one of those on the action list. It's a matter of where it fits and that's for council debate going forward in terms of how we action it. Amelia Lorentson 40:30.344
In terms of the surf management plan, there is questions raised about... Brian Stockwell 40:34.779
Point of order again, we've got a series of questions that are very broad. We're in the middle of an amendment, not a substantive motion. The question should relate to the way Amelia Lorentson 41:02.069
It relates to just something that was raised and I don't believe a correct answer was given to the question in terms of the scoping of the surf management plan. Frank Wilkie 41:12.244
Councillor Stockwell is quite correct. We're only talking about the amendment to your motion, but please, if you could save that for when we go back to your motion. Okay, so Councillor Finzel, do you have your hand up? Karen Finzel 41:25.724
Yes, thank you Mr Chair. Through the Chair to the CEO, just seeking clarification on his response to the previous question. In terms of notice of motion, and yes rightly stated we do have that mechanism to pull on as a councillor, some time back through council we talked about staff capabilities and capacity in terms of funding and finances with regards to bringing... Councillor Finzel, Councillor Finzel, I will need to pull you up there. We're talking about broader organisation capacity now. We're talking about the... the amendment before us is very specific and it relates... I have a basic question, Mr Chair. Frank Wilkie 42:06.714
Okay, what is the basic question as long as it relates to this amendment? Karen Finzel 42:12.247
Does the CEO prefer that we bring notice of motion as the priority process to be used? Amelia Lorentson 42:18.965
Point of order through the Chair. I think that question's been- Thank you. I was gonna say. Frank Wilkie 42:24.295
Answered, Councillor Finzel. We'll go to the vote on the amendment. Everyone has spoken to it except for Councillor Wegener. I don't know, Councillor Wegener, do you wish to speak to it? If not, I'm not going to close on it. No. Okay. We'll put it to the vote. Okay. Those in favour? That's Councillor Phillips, Laurence and Wilkie. Those against? Yes. Councillor Stockwell, Wegener. Nicola Wilson 42:55.881
No. Pardon? I voted Frank Wilkie 42:59.669
Yes. Oh, sorry, beg your pardon. So four is Councillor Wilkie, Phillips. Phillips, Lorentson and Wegener. Those against? Councillor Stockwell, Wilson and Finzel. Councillor Finzel you said yes, no, you mean no. I said no, thank you Mr Chair. Karen Finzel 43:19.766
I've got three against. I said yes to against. Frank Wilkie 43:25.251
Okay, thank you Councillor Wilson. Alright, so the amendment is carried. It becomes now the substantive motion and only Councillor Lorentson and Stockwell have spoken to the original motion. Any other councillors wish to speak to the motion? Councillor Lorentson, do you wish to close? I will. Amelia Lorentson 43:53.658
This motion means quite a lot to me. Respectful debate. An argument was put forward by a councillor and reference was made to Planning 101. Inefficient Inefficient. I've thrown all these words down. Inefficient. Mechanism. We're doing this for board riders. I think we really need to think about our words in our debate. I went through our director of planning, Kim Rawlings. It was her recommendation that this body of work be... be absorbed in the surf management plan which has already been scoped. She liked the direction of the notice of motion and her feedback was that we included as a dedicated section on first point understanding how important culturally, environmentally and socially... First point is not just your board riders but it's a community asset and how important it is for our community. So I really wanted to make that clear that it was the director of planning and her staff who reviewed the notice of motion and provided me with excellent feedback as a step forward. First point is more than just a surf break and it's more than just a surf break for residents in the community. It's a place of connection, it's a place of history, it's a place of belonging. It's shaped our community, our culture and for many of us, our lives. Over the last the last eight months, I've walked this journey with three incredible watermen. Average age, and I'm sorry guys, I'm just going to guess, probably about 75 to 80. And as someone who has surfed First Point personally for the past 15 years, I can say from the heart, it's spiritual, it's grounding and it's a place that teaches patience, respect and stewardship. It is Including First Point as part of the surf management plan ensures its values are formally recognised in council decision making. It was a step recommended by our Director of Planning and Strategic Planning, Kim Rawlings. It's not an onerous commitment, rather it's a practical first step in a direction that may provide enduring protections for this extraordinary place. I think what we've heard today around this table is that First Point means different things to different people and to councillors. For visitors, it's an internationally recognised surf destination, a drawcard for tourism. For our locals, it's not a tourist attraction. Again, it's a place of of belonging, of daily life. of daily ritual, of connection to our community and to each other. It's a place where I have healed and celebrated. And to our future generations, to my kids and their kids' kids, it's a piece of our heritage. Thank you very much, and have a great day, and have a great day, and have a great day, Community and it's also a responsibility. It's a legacy that we can leave for those who come after us. Frank Wilkie 48:04.101
Thank You councillor. I'll put the motion those in favour. That's Councillor, Lorentson, Wilkie. Online, is there anyone online? Okay. Against? Councillor Stockwell. Yes. Finzel. Councillor Wegener, which way are you going? Yes. That brings us to the next item. Brian Stockwell 48:53.123
Just before we do, I have a question on notice. There were statements made in the summary that was a recommendation of the Director, Kim Rawlings, who's not here to either correct that or agree with it. Can I have that on notice, please, to be answered? Sure. Alright, consideration of committee reports. Frank Wilkie 49:10.829
11.1.1 Is the Planning and Environment Committee recommendations, dated 10th February 2026. First item is commercial use of community land, policy amendments and upcoming tender process. Councillor Lorentson, you have a a conflict conflict of of interest you'd like to declare? I do, thank you. Larry Sengstock 49:34.156
In accordance with Chapter 5B of Amelia Lorentson 49:37.536
The Local Government Act 2009, I call the meeting that I have a declarable conflict of interest for item 11.11, commercial use of community land, policy amendments and upcoming tender process. this agenda as I take weekly surfing lessons with Josh Constable as an applicant in the upcoming commercial high use tender process and as my children have previously worked over 16 to 18 months ago for Dean Brady who I believe is also an applicant for the upcoming commercial high use tender process and my children are also members of the New Support Writers Club Association where they are coached by Dean Brady. coached by Dean Brady. I request to stay in the meeting as the report... I request to stay in the meeting as the report in front of us is a policy document, not a tender document. Brian Stockwell 50:34.321
Councillor Stockwell? Yeah, I'm happy to move that Councillor Lorentson be allowed to remain in the the basis that the standard wording community would accept that she can make the judgement in public interest. Frank Wilkie 50:51.540
Can we have a seconder for that please? Thank you. I'll second. You've seconded Councillor Stockwell's motion that Councillor Lorentson would be allowed to stay in the room for the reasons given. Anyone wish to speak to the motion? Brian Stockwell 51:08.916
Just before we do, can we add in that normal bit at the end about that a normal person would not be safe and could see that she would make an impartial decision? Frank Wilkie 51:42.520
In the public interest, we normally put in there in some forms. OK. All in favour? Can you speak closer to the microphone, Tom? You're very faint. I think that was a yes. Thank you, thank you, that's carried. We now come to the item itself, commercial use of community land policy and amendments and upcoming tender process. We have a mover and a seconder for that, and a seconder for Councillor. All in favour? Is that a yes Tom? Yes. Oh great, we can hear you now, thank you. 11.1.2 application for other change to development approval for bounce hotel, hostel, hostel, food and drink outlet at 1416 Mary Street, Noosaville. 11.1.3 was referred to the General Committee. 11.1.4 planning applications decided by delegated authority December 2025.11.1.5 multi-year environment collaboration grants and organisational alliance grants proposed reschedule. Tom, we can hear you online. 11.1.6 cascading climate risks from critical infrastructure failure project report. 11.1.7 is the Planning and Environment Committee recommendations on block. May I have a mover and seconder that these recommendations be moved and adopted. second seconded councillor Finzel move Laurence and all in favour yes yes yeah thank you that's carried 11.2 services and organisation committee recommendations dated 10th of February 11.2 point Noosa Shire Council annual report 11.2 point two council remuneration update 11.2 point three sourcing recommendation DRFA which is disaster to reconstruct that's disaster funding reconstruction authority funding reconstruction project procurement strategy 11.2 point four capital program 2526 delivery status report 11.2 point five composting expression of interest EOI outcome and recommendation to to commence commence early early contractor involvement, 11.2.6, services and organisation committee recommendations on block number, we have a mover and a seconder for that, Councillor moved, a seconder, Councillor Wilson, that's JP and Councillor Wilson, Councillor moved, all in favour? Yes. Carried unanimously. General committee recommendations, application 11.3.1, application for material change of use for multiple dwellings, affordable rental premises, 25 small dwellings at 64 Lake Macdonald Drive, Cooroy, which was referred from the planning and environment committee, 11.3.2, financial performance performance report January 2026, 11.3.3 budget review 2 2026, 11.3.4 operational plan 2025 2026, quarterly 2 quarterly reporting, 11.3.5 proposed motions for submission to Elgar National General Assembly 2026, 11.3.6 major event funding approvals, 11.3. approvals: 11.3.7, General Committee recommendations on block. May I have a mover and a seconder for the General Committee recommendations to be adopted? I'm happy to move. Moved by Councillor Finzel, seconded by Councillor Stockwell. All in favour? Nicola Wilson 55:52.390
Yes. Frank Wilkie 55:53.250
That's unanimous. We have one report direct to the ordinary meeting which is for a contract number CN25253. Sunshine Creek landslide. This being a confidential report we will go straight into confidential session of the agenda. So I'd like to move that the meeting be closed to the public pursuant to section 254J of the local government regulation 2012 for the purpose of discussing a contract proposed to contract proposed to be made by Council and in particular the potential commercial negotiations in relation to that contract for item 13.1, contract number CN25253, Sunshine Creek landslide. May I have a seconder for that please? Jessica Phillips 56:41.788
I'll give you a second. Frank Wilkie 56:42.848
Seconded by Councillor. in favour? Yes. That's unanimous. We ask that Nicola Wilson 01:21:04.760
Thank you. Right, welcome back everyone. Frank Wilkie 01:21:07.324
Councillor Stockwell. Yeah, I'm happy to move the recommendation. I'll give it a second. Seconded move by Councillor Stockwell, seconded by Councillor Lorentson. Councillor Stockwell used to speak about the tenant. Any other councillors wish to speak about the motion? Put the motion in favour. Yes. That's unanimous. Related Noosa Council Meetings
← Browse all Noosa Shire Council meeting transcripts
