Request For Delegation Under Section 42 Of The Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 Associated With OPW25/0072 Development Application For Operational Works (Vehicle Crossover, Roadworks, Drainage Works, Earthworks, Vegetation Clearing And Waterway Barrier Works) - 36 Roses Road Federal
See the votes on this matter →
What was decided?
The minuted decision sequence
No separately labelled carried Council Resolution has been identified here. Read each formal event and the complete item minutes; a lost motion is not necessarily the final outcome.
Read complete item-specific minutes
That Council
- Note the report by the Manager of Development Assessment to the Planning and Environment Committee Meeting dated 10 March 2026; and
- Pursuant to sections 257 and 259 of the Local Government Act 2009 (Qld), delegate authority to the Chief Executive Officer, including the power to sub-delegate to Position 10223, to make an application under section 42 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 (“the Act”) in relation to development application OPW25/0072 at 36 Roses Road Federal.
This summary follows this item’s minutes. The established voting totals use their existing method while differences are checked against the full records.
What was said?
Named discussion on NoosaWatch TV
These actual transcript passages match the item’s wording. The start and end of the item’s discussion are not yet confirmed; these excerpts are not measured item airtime or exact decision moments.
Frank Wilkie31:29Thank you Councillor colleagues for your comments on the Mayoral minute and the submission. I also would like to thank the staff for moving very quickly in a limited time frame to produce a 25 page very comprehensive submission on all the, raises a whole lot of questions about a bill which is drafted very broadly and raises a lot more questions. Provides answers. So I think the submission will be considered by the State government if they have all the authority to approve or not approve elements of it. The biggest, the most glaring omission in the bill from my perspective is there is no reference to there being any local representation from any Noosa representative. Noosa representatives, be they in the community, your local government, or the commercial sector, or environmental scientists. It is not geographically based at all. And I think the submission seeks to rectify that. I also see part C as not council's opposition to the bill. It's basically saying what we're doing. We do not support the bill in its current form because there are concerns. We want more information and we would like the final version of the bill to have more clarity. So, we're not supporting the bill in its current form because it is quite vague. It doesn't mean we do not accept the real politic that is going to happen and we want to work with the State government to get the best outcome for this community that we possibly can. Thank you Councillors. Put the motion. Those in favour? Councillor Wilson, Wegener, Stockwell, Finzel and Wilkie. Those against? Councillor Phillips, Councillor Lorentson. The minute is carried. We have no notified motions. That brings us to consideration of committee reports. First 11.1.1 Audit and Risk Committee recommendations from the meeting on the 20th of February.1 C. O. Update. 11.2 capital works program status update. 11.3 final management report Queensland Audit Office. 11.4 Audit and Risk Committee briefing paper Queensland Audit Office. 11.5 external audit plan Queensland Audit Office. 11.1.6 assessment of council's regulatory practices. 11.1.7 risk management and business continuity 11.1.8 internal audit update. 11.1.9 annual review ARCO Charter and annual review Internal Audit Policy. 11.1.10 ICT Cyber & Security risk update. 11.1.11 non-Compliant audit samples of suppliers. 11.1.12 project update EFTSure implementation. 11.1.13 asset valuation and the impact of AASB 2002-10 on the valuation of land. 11.1.14 financial services workforce planning and financial management assurance framework development. 11.1.15 Audit and Risk Committee recommendations en bloc. May I have a mover and a seconder for the Audit and Risk Committee? I have a mover and a seconder for the Audit and Risk Committee. Thank you. Member, Councillor Wilson. May I have a seconder, fellow Audit and Risk Committee member, Councillor Wegener. Any discussion? All in favour? That's carried unanimously. Apprentices 2, 11.2, Planning & Environment Committee recommendations, dated 10th March. 11.2.1, Noosa Plan 2020, section 18, amendment process for 94 and 170, Holts Road, Cooroy. 11.2.2, Noosa Plan 2020, amendment number 3, minor amendment. 11.2.3, request for delegation under section 42 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994, associated with operational works. 250072, development application for operational works, vehicle crossover, road works, drainage works, earthworks, vegetation clearing and waterway barrier works at 36 Roses Road, Federal. 11.2.4, planning applications decided by delegated authority, 20, 26. January 2026.11.2.5, Planning & Environment Committee recommendations en bloc. May I have a mover and a seconder for the Planning & Environment Committee recommendations?