Due to council's efforts to hide their meetings from the public, the video for the meeting was not made available. We have instead provided the audio of the meeting and the full transcript below.
Key Decisions & Discussions • Amelia Lorentson: Petition (93 signatories) to redesign the proposed Noosaville Foreshore “Big Pelican” toilet block for smaller footprint referred to CEO (Item 5.1; 01:39–02:11, 02:11–02:25). • Willy Ostwald: Deputation urged inclusion of a Living Collections Management Plan in the Noosa Botanic Gardens Masterplan to maintain scientific and curatorial integrity (Item 7.1; 03:05–11:13). • Jill Brownlee: Reported 2,000+ volunteer hours and provided plant records to support master planning; requested low-cost, near-term adoption of a collections plan (Item 7.1; 11:13–13:42). • Council: Voted to advocate to Qld Govt for a 3‑month trial replacing shark nets with non‑lethal tech (smart drumlines, etc.) during southern migration at Noosa Main Beach; carried unanimously after amendment disputes (Item 10.1; 01:00:29–02:04:41). • Jessica Phillips: Motion requiring independent third‑party review of community surveys for significant projects carried; CEO to report back on opportunities and costs (Item 10.2; 02:05:02–02:54:51). • Council: Adopted all Audit & Risk Committee recommendations of 12 Dec 2025 and 9 Jan 2026, incl. noting Q
Read full insight ↗
Key Decisions & Discussions • Amelia Lorentson: Petition (93 signatories) to redesign the proposed Noosaville Foreshore “Big Pelican” toilet block for smaller footprint referred to CEO (Item 5.1; 01:39–02:11, 02:11–02:25). • Willy Ostwald: Deputation urged inclusion of a Living Collections Management Plan in the Noosa Botanic Gardens Masterplan to maintain scientific and curatorial integrity (Item 7.1; 03:05–11:13). • Jill Brownlee: Reported 2,000+ volunteer hours and provided plant records to support master planning; requested low-cost, near-term adoption of a collections plan (Item 7.1; 11:13–13:42). • Council: Voted to advocate to Qld Govt for a 3‑month trial replacing shark nets with non‑lethal tech (smart drumlines, etc.) during southern migration at Noosa Main Beach; carried unanimously after amendment disputes (Item 10.1; 01:00:29–02:04:41). • Jessica Phillips: Motion requiring independent third‑party review of community surveys for significant projects carried; CEO to report back on opportunities and costs (Item 10.2; 02:05:02–02:54:51). • Council: Adopted all Audit & Risk Committee recommendations of 12 Dec 2025 and 9 Jan 2026, incl. noting QAO/KPMG papers, WHS report, recruitment audit, ICT actions, and appointing Ian Rushworth as A&R Chair (3‑yr term) (Items 11.1–11.2; 03:13:32–03:15:30). • Council: Adopted Noosa Local Disaster Management Plan 2026; repealed 2023 plan and authorised CEO for minor edits (Item 11.3.1; 03:15:30–03:16:30). • Council: Deferred Council‑managed trial of rescue tubes/life rings at unpatrolled beaches pending risk evaluation and evidence‑based strategy; endorsed SLSQ leadership (Item 11.3.2; 03:15:30–03:16:30). • Chris Steel: Disclosed 15,500 tonnes removed from 62 Lake Macdonald Dr; refused cost/tonne as commercial‑in‑confidence (Items 8.1; 22:34–23:16). • Kerri Contini/Paul Brinkman: Flagpole at Pomona War Memorial not supported in open park; further assessment to fit within garden bed; temporary flagpoles encouraged (Item 8.3 Q1; 29:51–31:35). • Kim Rawlings (via officers): Pomona Place Plan actions staged with draft short‑term plan showing progress; budget timing to govern delivery (Item 8.3 Q2; 32:29–33:40). Contentious / Transparency Matters • Amelia Lorentson: Successfully dissented from Chair’s ruling on her shark‑nets motion; Amendment No.1 ruled out after dissent vote (For: Finzel, Lorentson, Phillips, Wilson; Against: Wilkie, Stockwell, Wegener) (Item 10.1; 01:11:23–01:28:26). • Frank Wilkie: Tried a narrower amendment to broaden advocacy beyond letters; lost 3–4 (Lorentson, Phillips, Finzel, Wilson against) (Item 10.1; 01:32:38–01:53:05). • John Spencer: Challenged in‑house survey credibility and AV quality; CEO cited IAP2 framework; Corporate Services committed immediate PA use and future upgrades (Item 8.2; 23:52–29:28.919). • Pat Spicer: Alleged limited transparency/late engagement on 62/64 Lake Macdonald Dr; sought open forum and clarity on grants’ implications; officers defended role under Housing Strategy and Social Justice Charter (Items 7.2, 8.4; 13:54–22:11, 34:04–42:59). Legal / Risk • Margaret Gatt: Fraud loss reduced from $2.3m to $1.7m after recoveries; controls strengthened per QAO 2025 Interim Audit, incl. vendor masterfile controls, policy, cyber‑fraud training, EFTSure rollout, and risk‑based financial accountability program (Items 8.4 Q1; 35:30.100–37:02; 11.1.9 noted). • Council/QAO/KPMG: Noted 2025 Closing Report and approved 2024/25 Financial Statements for certification – signalling audit closure posture (Items 11.2.1–11.2.2; 03:13:32–03:15:30). • Chris Steel: Properly withheld contractor pricing as commercial‑in‑confidence, consistent with probity/competitive neutrality norms (Item 8.1; 22:49–23:07). • Meeting Procedure: Standing Orders s29.1 tested; Chair’s ability to rule on his own amendment challenged; process clarified by Acting CEO, with dissent mechanism applied correctly (Item 10.1; 01:16:28–01:28:26). • Governance: Audit & Risk Committee noted PID update per s254D(3) Local Government Regulation 2012 (Qld) (Item 11.1.10). Whales, Shark Nets & Public Safety • Amelia Lorentson: Advanced evidence‑based case (Cardno 2019) that replacing nets with drumlines could maintain target‑shark control while cutting bycatch ~97%; focused on southern migration when entanglements peak (Item 10.1; 01:04:20–01:10:22, 01:59:51–02:04:41). • Tom Wegener: Opposed removal without stronger evidence; emphasised need for data‑driven mitigation and noted NBRF advocacy/education programs (Item 10.1; 01:54:49.999–01:56:11, 01:51:04.400–01:52:16.531). • Council: Ultimately supported letter‑based advocacy while some argued for broader strategies; recorded unanimity for the refined 3‑month trial ask (Item 10.1; 02:04:41). Community Engagement & Surveys • Jessica Phillips: Motion mandates independent review (methodology/framing) for significant project surveys; addresses repeated community claims of bias (Item 10.2; 02:05:02–02:54:51; 8.2 Spencer, 7.2 Spicer). • Brian Stockwell: Sought “report‑first” approach on costs/implications; warned against policy by notice of motion; amendment lost (Item 10.2; 02:13:06–02:18:43, 02:38:05). • Richard MacGillivray: Confirmed mixed funding models; some projects can incorporate external review within grant budgets; others need co‑contribution (Item 10.2; 02:20:25–02:21:23). Housing at Cooroy (64/62 Lake Macdonald Dr) • Kim Rawlings (via officers): Justified Council role in enabling social/affordable housing under the Local Government Act, Social Justice Charter (2018) and Housing Strategy (2022); site among several assessed (Item 8.4 Q2; 40:00.560–42:59). • Chris Steel: Disclosed approx. 15,500 tonnes removed from 62 Lake Macdonald Dr works (Item 8.1 Q2; 23:08–23:16). • Pat Spicer: Sought open forum, clarity on $178k (Housing Support Program) and $4,099,040 (Residential Activation Fund) implications and equitable hinterland consultation (Item 8.4; 34:04–42:59). Environmental & Public Realm • Noosa Botanic Gardens: Friends flagged loss of rare species, inconsistent theming, inadequate records, and absence of garden‑focused planning; asked to embed a collections plan in Masterplan implementation (Item 7.1; 03:05–13:42). • Pomona War Memorial: Permanent flagpole in open park area not supported on safety/maintenance grounds; possible garden‑bed option to be further assessed; temporary poles and nearby fire station flagpole available (Item 8.3; 29:51–31:35). • Noosaville Foreshore: Accessibility‑focused “Changing Places” toilet acknowledged; redesign petition sent to CEO for consideration (Items 5.1; 02:11–02:25, 02:11). Governance, Audit & Financial Stewardship • Audit & Risk: Council noted CEO update, internal audits (recruitment), ICT action items, and endorsed 2026 rolling work plan; appointed Ian Rushworth as A&R Chair (3 years) (Item 11.1; 03:13:32–03:15:30). • Financial Reporting: Approved 2024/25 Annual Financial Statements for certification; noted draft 2024–25 Annual Report (Item 11.2; 03:13:32–03:15:30). • Public Interest Disclosure: Noted confidential PID update per LG Reg 2012 s254D(3) (Item 11.1.10).
Official Meeting MinutesRead minutes ↗
MINUTES
Ordinary Meeting
Thursday, 22 January 2026
10:00 AM Council Chambers, 9 Pelican Street, Tewantin
Crs Frank Wilkie (Chair), Karen Finzel, Amelia Lorentson, Jessica Phillips, Brian Stockwell, Tom Wegener, Nicola Wilson
“Noosa Shire – different by nature” ORDINARY MEETING MINUTES 22 JANUARY 2026
1 DECLARATION OF OPENING The meeting was declared open at 10.00am
2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF COUNTRY Noosa Council respectfully acknowledges the Traditional Custodians of the lands and waters of the Noosa area, the Kabi Kabi people, and pays respect to their Elders, past, present and emerging.
3 ATTENDANCE & APOLOGIES COUNCILLORS Cr Frank Wilkie (Chair) Cr Karen Finzel Cr Jessica Phillips Cr Amelia Lorentson Cr Brian Stockwell Cr Tom Wegener Cr Nicola Wilson
EXECUTIVE Acting Chief Executive Officer Richard MacGillivray Acting Director Corporate Services Margaret Gatt Acting Director Infrastructure Services Chris Steel Acting Director Community Services Paul Brinkman
APOLOGIES Nil.
4 CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES
4.1 ORDINARY MEETING MINUTES 18 DECEMBER 2025 Council Resolution Moved: Cr Amelia Lorentson Seconded: Cr Karen Finzel That the Minutes of the Ordinary Meeting held on 18 December 2025 be received and confirmed. Carried. For: Cr Frank Wilkie, Cr Karen Finzel, Cr Jessica Phillips, Cr Amelia Lorentson, Cr Brian Stockwell, Cr Tom Wegener, Cr Nicola Wilson Against: None ORDINARY MEETING MINUTES 22 JANUARY 2026
5 PETITIONS
5.1 PETITION: PROPOSED NEW TOILET STRUCTURE AT NOOSAVILLE FORESHORE The following material was presented to the meeting in relation to this item: Cr Lorentson – refer to Attachment 1 to the Minutes dated 22 January 2026. Council Resolution Moved: Cr Amelia Lorentson Seconded: Cr Jessica Phillips That the petition with 93 signatories submitted by Craig McGovern, requesting that Council redesign the proposed new toilet structure near the Big Pelican to make it smaller, less obtrusive and maximise the existing grassed area be received and referred to the Chief Executive Officer to determine appropriate action. Carried. For: Cr Frank Wilkie, Cr Karen Finzel, Cr Jessica Phillips, Cr Amelia Lorentson, Cr Brian Stockwell, Cr Tom Wegener, Cr Nicola Wilson Against: None
6. PRESENTATIONS Nil.
7. DEPUTATIONS
7.1 APPLICANT: WILLY OSTWALD, FRIENDS OF NOOSA BOTANIC GARDENS TOPIC: MASTERPLAN FOR NOOSA BOTANIC GARDENS SPEAKERS: WILLY OSTWALD, JILL BROWNLEE
7.2 APPLICANT: PAT SPICER TOPIC: COMMUNITY CONSULTATION SPEAKERS: PAT SPICER
8. PUBLIC QUESTION TIME
8.1 RHEA DEN BRAASEM QUESTION 1 What is the cost, per tonne, of material removed by truck from 62 Lake Macdonald Drive?
Response provided by Chris Steel, Acting Director Infrastructure Services Council is unable to provide the cost per tonne of Material Removed from 62 Lake MacDonald Drive as it would be breaching commercial in confidence through release of Carruthers Contracting’s competitive pricing rates, being of sensitive information
QUESTION 2 How many tonnes of material have been removed by truck from 62 Lake Macdonald Drive so far?
Response provided by Chris Steel, Acting Director Infrastructure Services An estimated total tonnage of 15,500 tonnes from 62 Lake MacDonald Drive. ORDINARY MEETING MINUTES 22 JANUARY 2026
8.2 JOHN SPENCER QUESTION 1 Would it not be better for Council to conduct community consultation surveys through an appropriate independent third party. This would almost certainly provide more detailed and accurate information and remove the perception of bias which is inherent in council run surveys. Does the council not think that this would improve community confidence that their views were being adequately represented particularly if the results were published in full and in a timely fashion?
Response provided by Acting Chief Executive Officer, Richard MacGillivray Thank you, Mr Spencer, for your question.
Council is committed to meaningful engagement that is reflective of the broader community and its practices are underpinned by the International Association of Public Participation (IAP2), globally recognised for its best practice approach to community engagement. Council also has a Community Engagement framework to provide the context on how to plan, design and implement the community engagement process for identified projects, strategies, and decision-making processes.
Surveys are one part of the conversation with our community, as we adopt an integrated approach to community engagement which is consistent with best practice. There are a range of options offered, including face-to-face engagement and the opportunity to provide written submissions.
Council staff make an operational decision to design, develop and test community engagement surveys in-house and these are developed by highly skilled engagement professionals. The cost to engage an independent third party to provide this service can be significant. For some of the complex or high-profile community engagement projects, such as the Noosaville Foreshore Infrastructure Master Plan, Pomona Place Plan and Housing Strategy, we have partnered with specialised consultants to assist with survey design and the analysis of data. In line with our Community Engagement Framework, we endeavour to “close the loop” with the community by reporting back what we heard and how it influenced Council’s decision-making.
We acknowledge there have been some delays in providing reports for some of our recent engagement projects. We continually review and investigate methods to enhance our engagement and encourage members of the community to sign up to be part of our newly formed Community Engagement Feedback panel for future projects
QUESTION 2 Would the Council please improve the sound system in the Council Chamber so that the person asking a public question is heard on the video proceedings with as much volume and clarity as the person responding for Council?
Response provided by Acting Director Corporate Services, Margaret Gatt Regarding the public question about improving the sound system in the Council Chamber to ensure that public questions are heard as clearly as the responses, I propose an immediate and a longer-term solution. For the immediate solution, we can utilise the portable PA system with two mobile microphones. This system is already used effectively during our remote Council meetings throughout the region. By using the PA system, we can amplify the questions so that the streaming audio picks them up clearly, ensuring that the public question is heard with much more volume and clarity.
In the long term, we plan to look at further permanent upgrades for the Council Chambers. ORDINARY MEETING MINUTES 22 JANUARY 2026
8.3 BRIAN O'CONNOR QUESTION 1 Pomona remains the only town in Noosa Shire without a flagpole at its war memorial. In its responses outlining progress on the Pomona Place Plan initiatives, the council states that the placement of a flagpole at the Pomona War Memorial is 'under consideration' - an action that has been underway, on and off, since before the memorial was refurbished and rededicated in 2018.
The question is this: This matter having been under investigation for the past seven years, what are the 'considerations' around a flagpole at this location and has that consideration resulted in any outcomes, such that the Pomona community can look forward to permission being granted for a flagpole to be located at the memorial rotunda in Joe Bazzo Park?
Response provided by Director Community Services Kerri Contini Thank you, Mr. O‘Connor, for your question and your continued interest in the Pomona Place Plan initiatives.
Council acknowledges your longstanding interest in the proposal for a permanent flagpole near the Pomona Rotunda War Memorial in Joe Bazzo Park. Over several years, Council officers have carefully evaluated various factors, including the park’s limited space, high community use, safety concerns related to children and pedestrian movement, and maintenance implications such as mowing access and obstruction risks. A permanent flagpole in the open park was not supported. These considerations were outlined in previous correspondence to you.
The idea of installing a flagpole was included for consideration in the Pomona Place Plan and will be further assessed by Council to see if it could be accommodated in an existing garden bed. This proposal still needs more research and hasn't yet become a funded project. The evaluation process will continue as resources, staff capacity, and overall organisational priorities permit.
In the interim, Council advises that temporary flagpoles can be effectively utilised for commemorative events, offering flexibility without permanently impacting the park's function. Additionally, the permanent flagpole located outside the Pomona Fire Station across the road is also available for use during commemorative occasions.
QUESTION 2 If it takes seven years to consider something as relatively simple as the placement of a flagpole in a park, beside a war memorial at Pomona, what prospect is there that Noosa Council will complete all 52 actions in the Pomona Place Plan within a 10-year timeframe; some of those actions being complex, in need of detailed planning and requiring cooperation and considerable funding from other levels of government?
Response provided by Director Strategic Planning & Environment Kim Rawlings The Pomona Place Plan has actions with specific timeframes for commencement to ensure implementation of the plan can be staged in a sustainable long term approach. A Draft Short Term Implementation Plan has been prepared showing good progress against many actions in the Place Plan. This will be continually monitored over time with medium and long term projects being considered over the appropriate timeframes as part of the council budget process to ensure adequate funding. ORDINARY MEETING MINUTES 22 JANUARY 2026
8.4 PAT SPICER QUESTION 1 While there were restrictions on releasing information to the public regarding the loss or $2.4 million through fraud in December 2024, were all staff in the financial department fully briefed on the contents of the Queensland Audit Office report immediately after the report was received as it explicitly warned about the fraud risk in "super master file" data changes and provided a case study of a recent council loss through such data changes being made to supplier bank account details?
Response provided by Acting Director Corporate Services Margaret Gatt Firstly, I’d like to confirm that whilst the initial loss was $2.3M, through recovery by the bank and our insurers, the current figure is $1.7M. This is still a substantial amount and Council does not take this lightly. We are making a range of changes and additions to prevent this happening again.
Council was notified by QAO in March 2024 of the fraud event that targeted Gold Coast Council prior to the calculated attack on Noosa Council.
Also as documented in our previous reports to the Audit and Risk committee and Council, the recommendations from the 2025 QAO Noosa Shire Council Interim Audit Report have been implemented or substantially progressed. Specifically;
Council has met all reporting obligations Council has conducted regular mandatory cyber-fraud training to better equip our staff for such activities Council has strengthened processes for updating, maintaining and securing the vendor credit Masterfile including the development of a Vendor Maintenance Policy Council is in the process of establishing an independent, risk-based financial accountability program to review and audit the accuracy and proper use of financial information Council has substantially progressed the implementation of third-party payment protection software (EFTsure) to validate banking information
QUESTION 2 Why is Noosa Council taking on the state responsibility of providing housing by spending millions above grants to remediate and install all infrastructure for housing at 64 Lake Macdonald Drive Cooroy as well as entering into a contract with Coast2Bay to build 26 units when it is a fact that this site does not meet the housing strategy actions of ready access to services, transport and proximity to work?
Response provided by Director Strategic Planning & Environment Kim Rawlings The housing crisis currently gripping Australia is one that neither the State or Federal governments are going to be able to solve alone in a short time. Rather than sitting back and expecting the problem to be solved by other levels of government, Noosa Council along with many other Local Governments has chosen to be part of the solution. Despite the belief by some that this is not a Local Government responsibility, Local governments have a responsibility to ensure their communities are places people want to live and families can thrive, with amenities and services critical to people’s livelihoods. Local Governments are specifically required to plan for the needs of its community under the Local Government Act, this could legitimately include land use and development outcomes to support housing. Many Councils across Australia are increasingly exploring how they can support affordable housing in response to local needs including Sunshine Coast and Moreton Bay amongst others. Councils also have a critical role in enabling housing outcomes through planning, servicing and often land. ORDINARY MEETING MINUTES 22 JANUARY 2026
Noosa Council's 2018 Social Justice Charter commits Council to implementing policies and providing services that decrease inequality, to doing what it can to ensure Noosa is a diverse community where there are affordable places for people to live. At the 2021 Census there were 2,461 low to medium income Noosa Shire households in housing stress. Since then, the situation has only worsened. To illustrate, the median weekly rent for Cooroy has increased from $500 at the time of the 2021 census to $800 in the September 2025 quarter. That's a 60% increase in 4 years.
In endorsing the 2022 Housing Strategy Noosa Council committed to encouraging greater public and private investment in more social and affordable housing in the Shire and partnering with registered Community Housing Providers and others with the aim of providing more social and affordable. This included investigating Council owned land which might be put to the purpose of housing locals. The land at Lake Macdonald Drive was just one site subject to feasibility investigations with others being in the centres at Noosa Junction and at Tewantin. Thes actions are specifically listed in the Housing Strategy and therefore do meet the Housing strategy actions. A Guide for Local Councils in Delivery of Affordable Housing, produced by the ALGA, Housing Australia and Australian Community Housing has recently showcased Noosa Council's efforts, including the Cooroy land-based contribution to social housing delivery
9 MAYORAL MINUTES Nil.
10 NOTIFIED MOTIONS
10.1 THREE-MONTH TRIAL OF ALTERNATE SHARK MITIGATION MEASURES DURING SOUTHERN WHALE MIGRATION The following material was presented to the meeting in relation to this item: Cr Lorentson – refer to Attachment 2 to the Minutes dated 22 January 2026 Cr Wilkie - refer to Attachment 3 to the Minutes dated 22 January 2026 Cr Wilkie - refer to Attachment 4 to the Minutes dated 22 January 2026 Cr Wilkie - refer to Attachment 5 to the Minutes dated 22 January 2026 Cr Wilkie - refer to Attachment 6 to the Minutes dated 22 January 2026 Motion Moved: Cr Amelia Lorentson Seconded: Cr Jessica Phillips That Council write to the State requesting that, during the 2026 whale migration period, the Queensland Government consider a three-month trial replacing traditional shark nets with smart drumlines or other contemporary, non-lethal mitigation technologies that allow for the safe passage of migrating whales, with Noosa Main Beach proposed as the trial location. This trial should apply specifically to the southern migration period when whales, including vulnerable calves, are travelling south and when the majority of entanglements are known to occur.
Amendment No.1 Moved: Cr Frank Wilkie Seconded: That the Motion be amended to read: A. Note the attached correspondence to and from the State Government on Noosa Council’s request to trial the removal of shark nets during whale migration season in conjunction with deployment of non-lethal mitigation methods, including smart drumlines and aerial drone ORDINARY MEETING MINUTES 22 JANUARY 2026
surveillance, and B. Formulate a range of advocacy strategies, not limited to letter writing, to achieve the objective of a trial for shark net removal during whale migration season. These strategies are to include advocacy for a three-month trial during the southern migration period when whales, including vulnerable calves, are travelling south when the majority of entanglements are known to occur.
Cr Lorentson called the amendment out of order according to Section 29.1 of the Standing Orders.
The Chairperson ruled that the amendment was in order and not contrary to section 29.1 of the Standing Orders.
Procedural Motion Moved: Cr Amelia Lorentson Seconded: Cr Nicola Wilson That the Chairperson's ruling be dissented from. For: Cr Karen Finzel, Cr Amelia Lorentson, Cr Jessica Phillips, Cr Nicola Wilson, Against: Cr Frank Wilkie, Cr Brian Stockwell, Cr Tom Wegener
Amendment No. 1 was not considered by the meeting, as the dissent motion was carried, and the amendment was therefore considered out of order.
Amendment No 2. Moved: Cr Frank Wilkie Seconded: Cr Tom Wegener That the Motion be amended to read: That Council: A. Note the attached correspondence (provided as Attachments 3 - 6 to the Minutes dated 22 January 2026) to and from the State Government on Noosa Council’s request to trial the removal of shark nets during whale migration season in conjunction with deployment of non-lethal mitigation methods, including smart drumlines and aerial drone surveillance, and B. Councillors discuss a range of advocacy methods, not limited to letter writing, to achieve the objective of a trial for shark net removal during whale migration season. These are to include advocacy for a three-month trial during the southern migration period when whales, including vulnerable calves, are travelling south when the majority of entanglements are known to occur.
Lost. For: Cr Frank Wilkie, Cr Brian Stockwell, Cr Tom Wegener Against: Cr Karen Finzel, Cr Jessica Phillips, Cr Amelia Lorentson, Cr Nicola Wilson
Council Resolution Moved: Cr Amelia Lorentson Seconded: Cr Jessica Phillips That Council write to the State requesting that, during the 2026 whale migration period, the Queensland Government consider a three-month trial replacing traditional shark nets with smart drumlines or other contemporary, non-lethal mitigation technologies that allow for the safe passage of migrating whales, with Noosa Main Beach proposed as the trial location. ORDINARY MEETING MINUTES 22 JANUARY 2026
This trial should apply specifically to the southern migration period when whales, including vulnerable calves, are travelling south and when the majority of entanglements are known to occur. Carried. For: Cr Frank Wilkie, Cr Karen Finzel, Cr Jessica Phillips, Cr Amelia Lorentson, Cr Brian Stockwell, Cr Tom Wegener, Cr Nicola Wilson Against: None
10.2 INDEPENDENT REVIEW OF COMMUNITY SURVEYS Motion Moved: Cr Jessica Phillips Seconded: Cr Amelia Lorentson That Council: A. Requires community engagement surveys that are developed to support consultation and/or decision-making for significant Council projects, undergo an independent review by a suitably qualified third party prior to release, to ensure methodological integrity, neutrality of framing, and confidence in the reliability of the data used to inform Council decision-making; and B. Requests the CEO to provide a report back to Council for further consideration and/or decision that explores the potential opportunities and costs in line with Council’s Standing Orders.
Amendment Moved: Cr Brian Stockwell Seconded: Cr Tom Wegener That the motion be amended to read: That Council A. Requires community engagement surveys that are developed to support consultation and/or decision-making for significant Council projects, undergo an independent review by a suitably qualified third party prior to release, to ensure methodological integrity, neutrality of framing, and confidence in the reliability of the data used to inform Council decision-making; and B. Requests the CEO to provide a report back to Council for further consideration and/or decision that explores the potential opportunities, implications and costs of obtaining independent review of surveys to be used as part of the community engagement on significant Council projects and plans. in line with Council’s Standing Orders. Lost. For: Cr Frank Wilkie, Cr Brian Stockwell Against: Cr Karen Finzel, Cr Jessica Phillips, Cr Amelia Lorentson, Cr Tom Wegener, Cr Nicola Wilson
Council Resolution Moved: Cr Jessica Phillips Seconded: Cr Amelia Lorentson That Council: A. Requires community engagement surveys that are developed to support consultation and/or decision-making for significant Council projects, undergo an independent review ORDINARY MEETING MINUTES 22 JANUARY 2026
by a suitably qualified third party prior to release, to ensure methodological integrity, neutrality of framing, and confidence in the reliability of the data used to inform Council decision-making; and B. Requests the CEO to provide a report back to Council for further consideration and/or decision that explores the potential opportunities and costs in line with Council’s Standing Orders.
Carried. For: Cr Frank Wilkie, Cr Karen Finzel, Cr Jessica Phillips, Cr Amelia Lorentson, Cr Nicola Wilson Against: Cr Brian Stockwell, Cr Tom Wegener
11. CONSIDERATION OF COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS
11.1 AUDIT & RISK COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS DATED 12 DECEMBER 2025
11.1.1. CEO UPDATE
That Council note the CEO Update to the Audit & Risk Committee dated 12 December 2025.
11.1.2. QAO / KPMG - 2025 AUDIT COMMITEE BRIEFING PAPER
That Council note the Briefing Paper provided by the Queensland Audit Office (QAO) & KPMG to the Audit & Risk Committee meeting dated 12 December 2025.
11.1.3. WORKPLACE HEALTH AND SAFETY ANNUAL REPORT 2024/25
That Council note the report by the Workplace Health and Safety Co-ordinator to the Audit and Risk Committee Meeting dated 12 December 2025 regarding Workplace Health and Safety Annual Report 2024/25.
That Council note the report by the A/Executive Officer to the Audit & Risk Committee dated 12 December 2025 regarding the (Crowe) Final Report for the Internal Audit of Recruitment Management.
11.1.5. BRIEFING PAPER ON OUTSTANDING (ICT) ACTIONS ITEMS
That Council note the report by the Acting ICT Manager to the Audit and Risk Committee meeting dated 12th December 2025 on outstanding Action Items from previous meetings.
11.1.6. UPDATE ON THE REVIEW OF OUTANDING ACTION ITEMS
That Council note the report by the A/Executive Officer to the Committee dated 12 December 2025 regarding the update on the review of outstanding action items ORDINARY MEETING MINUTES 22 JANUARY 2026
from previous internal audits.
11.1.7. 2026 DRAFT ANNUAL ROLLING WORKS PLAN AND STANDING AGENDA ITEMS
The Audit & Risk Committee approved the 2026 proposed annual rolling work plan and standing agenda items listing provided in the agenda.
11.1.8. DISCUSSION TO RECOMMEND NEW CHAIR OF AUDIT AND RISK COMMITTEE
That Council note the recommendation of the Audit & Risk Committee to appoint Ian Rushworth as the Chair of the Audit & Risk Committee for a term of three (3) years
11.1.9. 2024 FRAUD EVENT ANALYSIS, CORRECTIVE ACTIONS AND STATUS UPDATE
That Council note the report by the Acting Director Corporate Services, Margaret Gatt to the Audit and Risk Committee meeting dated 12 December 2025 regarding the 2024 Fraud Event Corrective Actions and Status Update.
11.1.10. PUBLIC INTEREST DISCLOSURE UPDATE - S254D(3) LG REG 2012 (QLD)
That Council note the report by the Governance Manager to the Audit & Risk Committee meeting dated 12 December 2025 and the update on public interest disclosure matters.
11.1.11. AUDIT & RISK COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS EN BLOC
Council Resolution Moved: Cr Tom Wegener Seconded: Cr Nicola Wilson That the Recommendations of the Audit and Risk Committee meeting dated 12 December 2025 be received and adopted. Carried. For: Cr Frank Wilkie, Cr Karen Finzel, Cr Jessica Phillips, Cr Amelia Lorentson, Cr Brian Stockwell, Cr Tom Wegener, Cr Nicola Wilson Against: None
11.2 AUDIT & RISK COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS DATED 9 JANUARY 2026
11.2.1. QAO / KPMG 2025 CLOSING REPORT
That Council note Attachment 1 titled 2025 Closing Report by QAO / KPMG to the Audit & Risk Committee dated 9 January 2026. ORDINARY MEETING MINUTES 22 JANUARY 2026
11.2.2. 2024-2025 ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
That Council A. Note the report by the Acting Financial Services Manager to the Audit and Risk Committee dated 9 January 2025; and B. Approve the 2024/25 Annual Financial Statements for certification by the Mayor and Chief Executive Officer.
11.2.3. NOOSA SHIRE COUNCIL ANNUAL REPORT 2024 - 2025
That Council A. Note the report by the Governance Manager to the Audit & Risk Committee meeting dated 12 January 2026 regarding corporate reporting; and B. Note Council’s draft Annual Report for 2024 - 2025 financial year.
11.2.4. AUDIT & RISK COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS EN BLOC
Council Resolution Moved: Cr Nicola Wilson Seconded: Cr Amelia Lorentson That the Recommendations of the Audit and Risk Committee meeting dated 9 January 2026 be received and adopted. Carried. For: Cr Frank Wilkie, Cr Karen Finzel, Cr Jessica Phillips, Cr Amelia Lorentson, Cr Brian Stockwell, Cr Tom Wegener, Cr Nicola Wilson Against: None
11.3 GENERAL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS DATED 19 JANUARY 2026
11.3.1. ENDORSEMENT OF NOOSA LOCAL DISASTER MANAGEMENT PLAN 2026
That Council A. Note the report by the Disaster Management Officer to the General Committee Meeting dated 19 January 2026 B. Repeal the Noosa Local Disaster Management Plan 2023; and C. Adopt the Noosa Local Disaster Management Plan 2026 as provided at Attachment 1 to the Endorsement of the Noosa Local Disaster Management Plan 2026 report. D. Authorise the CEO to make minor changes or amendments to the Plan prior to publishing the final document.
11.3.2. RESPONSE TO NOTICE OF MOTION - TRIAL OF REMOTE RESCUE TUBES/LIFE RINGS AT UNPATROLLED BEACHES
That Council A. Note the report by the Acting Local Laws and Environmental Health Manager to the General Committee dated 19 January 2026 ORDINARY MEETING MINUTES 22 JANUARY 2026
B. Support Surf Lifesaving Queensland as the State’s peak coastal safety authority and Surf Lifesaving Clubs with their funded and managed roll out programs; and C. Defer the implementation of a Council managed trial of remote rescue tubes and life rings at unpatrolled beach locations until: 1. The risks associated with current trials and any emerging issues at Noosa National Park, as well as programs elsewhere in Australia and overseas, have been critically evaluated by Council; and 2. An appropriate evidence-based management strategy has been developed to manage those risks and issues (detailed as Option 2 in the report).
11.3.3. PLANNING APPLICATIONS DECIDED BY DELEGATED AUTHORITY – NOVEMBER 2025
That Council note the report by the Development Assessment Manager to the General Committee Meeting on 19 January 2026 regarding applications that have been decided by delegated authority for November 2025 as provided at Attachment 1 to the Report.
11.3.4. PROCUREMENT CONTRACTS ASSESSMENT WORKING TEAM - CONTRACT AWARDS UNDER CEO DELEGATION
That Council note the report by the Acting Director Corporate Services to the General Committee Meeting dated 19 January 2026 for contracts awarded under CEO Delegation, via the Procurement Contracts Assessment Working Team, for the period 1 July 2025 to 31 December 2025.
11.3.5. FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE REPORT - DECEMBER 2025
That Council note the report by Revenue Services Manager and Financial Services Manager (Acting) to the General Committee dated 19 January 2026 regarding Council's financial performance to 31 December 2025.
11.3.6. GENERAL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS EN BLOC
Council Resolution Moved: Cr Jessica Phillips Seconded: Cr Karen Finzel That the Recommendations of the General Committee meeting dated 19 January 2026 be received and adopted. Carried. For: Cr Frank Wilkie, Cr Karen Finzel, Cr Jessica Phillips, Cr Amelia Lorentson, Cr Brian Stockwell, Cr Tom Wegener, Cr Nicola Wilson Against: None
Full Meeting TranscriptMeeting Transcript Below - Select To Listen / Share / Download Video Clips
Disclaimer: The transcript below is produced by our own transcription systems and will contain errors and omissions, including incorrect speaker attribution. It is provided for informational purposes only and may be inaccurate or incomplete. Do not rely on this content; for definitive statements, speakers, decisions and context, always refer to official council sources. We accept no responsibility or liability for any reliance on it.