Skip to the record
The first. The best. The only NoosaWatch™.
Item 7.4.2026-07-07 · General CommitteeOfficial item record

MCU25/0119 - Application For Material Change Of Use Of Premises To Establish Indoor Sport And Recreation At 26 Eenie Creek Road, Noosaville

← Meeting agenda & transcript

See the votes on this matter →

What was decided?

The minuted decision sequence

No separately labelled carried Council Resolution has been identified here. Read each formal event and the complete item minutes; a lost motion is not necessarily the final outcome.

1Committee RecommendationCarried

Moved: Brian Stockwell · Seconded: Karen Finzel

That Council note the report by the Senior Development Planner to the General Committee Meeting dated 7 July 2026 regarding Application No. MCU25/0119 for a Development Permit for Material Change of Use - Indoor Sport and Recreation situated at 26 Eenie Creek Rd Noosaville; and

A. Approve the application in accordance with the proposed conditions outlined in Attachment 1; and

B. Note the report is provided in accordance with Section 63(5) of the Planning Act 2016; and

C. Find the following matters relevant to the assessment and sufficient reason to approve the application:

1. The co-location of Indoor Sport and Recreation uses with established medical services such as radiology, cancer treatment and general practitioners creates a complementary health and wellness cluster. This integrated approach is consistent with the strategic intent to encourage industry clustering and efficient use of existing approved floor space within the Noosa Business Centre.

2. In terms of community wellbeing, the development enhances accessibility to a broad range of health, fitness and recovery services within a single, centrally located facility. The co-location of services improves convenience and supports the delivery of multi-purpose, shared spaces, consistent with the planning scheme’s objectives for vibrant and inclusive activity centres. It also reinforces the role of the Noosa Business Centre as a key hub for health and community services.

3. While the proposed Indoor Sport and Recreation tenancies do not align with the intended large-format function of the precinct, they form part of an existing approved development and are designed to operate in a complementary to the medical uses within the building. 

4. The proposal is an appropriate use of the approved built form, supporting the functional integration of health-related services within the Major Centre Zone of the Noosa Business Centre.

Carried.

For 7 named

Frank WilkieBrian StockwellKaren FinzelNicola WilsonJessica PhillipsAmelia LorentsonTom Wegener

Against 0 named

No names recorded on this side.

Official minutes · section 1

Read complete item-specific minutes
Committee Recommendation
Moved:Cr Brian Stockwell
Seconded:Cr Karen Finzel
That Council note the report by the Senior Development Planner to the General Committee Meeting dated 7 July 2026 regarding Application No. MCU25/0119 for a Development Permit for Material Change of Use - Indoor Sport and Recreation situated at 26 Eenie Creek Rd Noosaville; and
  1. Approve the application in accordance with the proposed conditions outlined in Attachment 1; and
  2. Note the report is provided in accordance with Section 63(5) of the Planning Act 2016; and
  3. Find the following matters relevant to the assessment and sufficient reason to approve the application:
    1. The co-location of Indoor Sport and Recreation uses with established medical services such as radiology, cancer treatment and general practitioners creates a complementary health and wellness cluster. This integrated approach is consistent with the strategic intent to encourage industry clustering and efficient use of existing approved floor space within the Noosa Business Centre.
    2. In terms of community wellbeing, the development enhances accessibility to a broad range of health, fitness and recovery services within a single, centrally located facility. The co-location of services improves convenience and supports the delivery of multi-purpose, shared spaces, consistent with the planning scheme’s objectives for vibrant and inclusive activity centres. It also reinforces the role of the Noosa Business Centre as a key hub for health and community services.
    3. While the proposed Indoor Sport and Recreation tenancies do not align with the intended large-format function of the precinct, they form part of an existing approved development and are designed to operate in a complementary to the medical uses within the building. 
    4. The proposal is an appropriate use of the approved built form, supporting the functional integration of health-related services within the Major Centre Zone of the Noosa Business Centre.
Carried.
 For:Cr Brian Stockwell, Cr Karen Finzel, Cr Amelia Lorentson, Cr Jessica Phillips, Cr Tom Wegener, Cr Frank Wilkie, Cr Nicola Wilson
 Against:None



This summary follows this item’s minutes. The established voting totals use their existing method while differences are checked against the full records.

What was said?

Named discussion on NoosaWatch TV

These actual transcript passages match the item’s wording. The start and end of the item’s discussion are not yet confirmed; these excerpts are not measured item airtime or exact decision moments.

Brian Stockwell247:15
Then move on to the next item on the agenda which I'm guessing since the planning staff are coming up is the oh now it wasn't what I was what I was going to say. T it's-U-25-0-1-1-9, application for Material Change of Use of premises to establish indoor sport and recreation at 26 Eenie Creek Road, Noosaville. And we have the Director, the manager and the person who does the work. Beautiful.
Georgina247:49
Good afternoon. I'm Georgina. I'm one of the senior planners. So the application that we have in front of us today is for a Material Change of Use establish an indoor sport and recreation uses within the existing building at 25 Eenie Creek Road. So this is probably more commonly known as the medihub building. So we're looking at an existing two story building and they're looking at locating, and sorry, they're looking at gaining approval within the upper level tendencies there. So this application has followed an impact inconsistent application pathway. And I suppose this is why we are here today. Through that public notification period of three weeks, no submissions were received during that time. And by way of by way of background, the site has already been developed under an existing approval for a Material Change of Use that was approved under a previous scheme, being the 2006 planning scheme, and that was for the purpose of medical and office space. Application here is seeking to retain the existing built form while changing the use of five existing tenancies on the upper level. So the intent of this is because the applicant, I suppose, is looking for increased leasing opportunities for those upper level tenancies. Mean, I suppose it's also for the purpose of complementing the existing established uses of the building being primarily meant for medical purposes and each tenancy was originally developed in accordance with which was assessed under the 2000 2006 planning scheme. So this allowed for tenancies to have an area less than 400 square metres which was in accordance with the scheme at the time. Whereas the current scheme in effect is I suppose seeking indoor sport and recreation uses within the zone, within this precinct of 400 square metres, well greater than 400 square metres so that it's larger format sort of buildings. To a there's larger format buildings importantly again just reiterating these smaller tenancies and form part of an already approved and established development so the configuration of this existing building is quite limited and it's very unlikely that it will ever be used for showroom purposes or those large format sort of purposes like we're not going to get a beacon lighting here um I suppose in terms of like servicing constraints um to the site in an upper level and I suppose limited to stairs and a lift um as well as the floor to ceiling height. So I suppose it was never um the large format retail outcomes were sorry never I'm not quite envisioned under the Noosa Plan within this building sorry um so through the application process I've done an assessment against a scheme um an economic needs analysis has also been provided in support of the application um we've all reviewed that and I'm quite comfortable that it's meeting the strategic framework of the Noosa Plan and has been recommended for approval subject to conditions
1 suggested discussion start time
  • 14838.0 seconds on the council source timeline · Approximate discussion link. The end of the discussion is not yet confirmed.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.