Skip to the record
Trusted by locals. Built for Noosa.
Item 7.1.2025-02-17 · General CommitteeOfficial item record

MCU21/0154.02 – APPLICATION FOR A MINOR CHANGE TO DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL FOR HOME BASED BUSINESS (MEAT PROCESSING FACILITY) AT 82 PATTERSON DRIVE, TINBEERWAH (referred from Planning and Environment Committee dated 11 February 2025)

← Meeting agenda & transcript

See the votes on this matter →

What was decided?

The minuted decision sequence

No separately labelled carried Council Resolution has been identified here. Read each formal event and the complete item minutes; a lost motion is not necessarily the final outcome.

1MotionLost

Moved: Brian Stockwell · Seconded: Tom Wegener

That Council note the report by the Senior Planner to the Planning and Environment Meeting dated 11 February 2025 regarding Application No. MCU21/0154.02 for a minor change to the development approval for a Home-based business (Meat Processing Facility) situated at 82 Patterson Drive, Tinbeerwah and:

A. Approve the application and agree to change condition 10 outlined in Attachment 1.     

B. Delete Condition 21   

C. Delete condition 6.

D. Note the report is provided in accordance with Section 63(5) of the Planning Act 2016.

Lost.

For 2 named

Nicola WilsonBrian Stockwell

Against 5 named

Jessica PhillipsKaren FinzelFrank WilkieAmelia LorentsonTom Wegener

Official minutes · section 1

2AmendmentLapsed

Moved: Frank Wilkie · Seconded: Not recorded

Replace item B with: Refuse to delete Condition 21

Amendment lapsed for want of a seconder.

Seconded not recorded in the source.

Official minutes · section 12

3MotionOutcome not confirmed

Moved: Frank Wilkie · Seconded: Karen Finzel

That Council note the report by the Senior Planner to the Planning and Environment Meeting dated 11 February 2025 regarding Application No. MCU21/0154.02 for a minor change to the development approval for a Home-based business (Meat Processing Facility) situated at 82 Patterson Drive, Tinbeerwah and:

A. Approve the application and agree to change condition 10 outlined in Attachment 1.     

B. Refuse the request to delete Condition 21, instead changing the condition as outlined in Attachment 1.     

C. Delete condition 6.

D. Note the report is provided in accordance with Section 63(5) of the Planning Act 2016.

Official minutes · section 17

4Procedural MotionLapsed

Moved: Karen Finzel · Seconded: Not recorded

That consideration of item 7.1 be deferred to the Ordinary Meeting dated 20 February 2025 to allow staff to engage with relevant parties in relation to establishment of boundary fence.

The matter lapsed for want of a seconder.

Seconded not recorded in the source.

Official minutes · section 25

5Committee RecommendationCarried

Moved: Frank Wilkie · Seconded: Karen Finzel

That Council note the report by the Senior Planner to the Planning and Environment Meeting dated 11 February 2025 regarding Application No. MCU21/0154.02 for a minor change to the development approval for a Home-based business (Meat Processing Facility) situated at 82 Patterson Drive, Tinbeerwah and:

A. Approve the application and agree to change condition 10 outlined in Attachment 1.     

B. Refuse the request to delete Condition 21, instead changing the condition as outlined in Attachment 1.     

C. Delete condition 6.

D. Note the report is provided in accordance with Section 63(5) of the Planning Act 2016.

Carried.

For 5 named

Brian StockwellTom WegenerNicola WilsonJessica PhillipsFrank Wilkie

Against 2 named

Karen FinzelAmelia Lorentson

Official minutes · section 30

Read complete item-specific minutes
Motion
Moved:
Cr Brian Stockwell
Seconded:
Cr Tom Wegener
That Council note the report by the Senior Planner to the Planning and Environment Meeting dated 11 February 2025 regarding Application No. MCU21/0154.02 for a minor change to the development approval for a Home-based business (Meat Processing Facility) situated at 82 Patterson Drive, Tinbeerwah and:
  1. Approve the application and agree to change condition 10 outlined in Attachment 1.     
  2. Delete Condition 21   
  3. Delete condition 6.
  4. Note the report is provided in accordance with Section 63(5) of the Planning Act 2016.
For:            Crs Stockwell and Wilson
Against:    Crs Wilkie, Lorentson, Wegener, Phillips, Lorentson and Finzel.
Lost.


Amendment

Moved:Cr Frank Wilkie
Seconded:

Replace item B with: Refuse to delete Condition 21
Amendment lapsed for want of a seconder.


Motion

Moved:Cr Frank Wilkie
Seconded:Cr Karen Finzel

That Council note the report by the Senior Planner to the Planning and Environment Meeting dated 11 February 2025 regarding Application No. MCU21/0154.02 for a minor change to the development approval for a Home-based business (Meat Processing Facility) situated at 82 Patterson Drive, Tinbeerwah and:
  1. Approve the application and agree to change condition 10 outlined in Attachment 1.     
  2. Refuse the request to delete Condition 21, instead changing the condition as outlined in Attachment 1.     
  3. Delete condition 6.
  4. Note the report is provided in accordance with Section 63(5) of the Planning Act 2016.


Procedural Motion

Moved:Cr Karen Finzel
Seconded:

That consideration of item 7.1 be deferred to the Ordinary Meeting dated 20 February 2025 to allow staff to engage with relevant parties in relation to establishment of boundary fence.
The matter lapsed for want of a seconder.


Committee Recommendation

Moved:Cr Frank Wilkie
Seconded:Cr Karen Finzel

That Council note the report by the Senior Planner to the Planning and Environment Meeting dated 11 February 2025 regarding Application No. MCU21/0154.02 for a minor change to the development approval for a Home-based business (Meat Processing Facility) situated at 82 Patterson Drive, Tinbeerwah and:
  1. Approve the application and agree to change condition 10 outlined in Attachment 1.     
  2. Refuse the request to delete Condition 21, instead changing the condition as outlined in Attachment 1.     
  3. Delete condition 6.
  4. Note the report is provided in accordance with Section 63(5) of the Planning Act 2016.
For:            Crs Wilson, Stockwell, Wilkie, Wegner and Phillips
Against:     Crs Lorentson and Finzel
Carried.



This summary follows this item’s minutes. The established voting totals use their existing method while differences are checked against the full records.

What was said?

Named discussion on NoosaWatch TV

These actual transcript passages match the item’s wording. The start and end of the item’s discussion are not yet confirmed; these excerpts are not measured item airtime or exact decision moments.

Brian Stockwell0:00
I declare the meeting open and wish to acknowledge the Kabi Kabi people, the Traditional Custodians of this land, their elders past, present and emerging. We are all in attendance but we have Councillor Finzel and Councillor Lorentson attending via online. Means. So welcome all. Confirmation of minutes. Would someone like to move? I'll move. Councillor Wilkie. Do we have a seconder? Councillor Wegener. I presume there's no discussion. All those in favour? Yes. That's unanimous. Thank you. We have no presentations nor do we have deputations so we're moving on to an item referred from committees and there is one of those. It's item 7.1. It's a material use 210154.02. Application for a minor change to development approval for a home-based business meat processing facility at 82 Patterson Drive, Tinbeerwah. And we welcome Patrick, and we welcome Richard, and we welcome Andrew from the development control team to the table. And Andrew, give us an overview.
Andrew1:07
That's it. Thank you. Council is in receipt of an application for a change to a approval for Material Change of Use, home-based business, meat processing facility at 82 Patterson Drive, Tinbeerwah. The change request relates to a number of the development parameters which were applicable to the site when Council gave the approval back in 2021. I'm not sure if everybody is aware of the approval, but the approval given in 2021 relates to the processing of deer meat at the site. The current approval allows for up to 10 deer be processed at the property once a week. So they are the sort of general parameters which are applicable to the site. The only other issue relevant at the moment is that only one person and resident of the site can occupy and undertake the Homebased business use. So that's the current sort of set up. The applicant has requested a change to the approval to allow up to two additional employees to assist at the site, to approval the mainly because the physical handling of the current approved number of deers to be processed at the site is allowing too much, it's too labour intensive for the owner and the applicant, so they would like to have an additional up to two people to assist during the permitted hours of operation, which are between 8 and 5pm Monday to Friday. Thank you. So the actual amendment would require a change to number of the conditions of the approval to allow that to occur, as well as to allow that to occur between the hours of 8 and 4pm Monday to Friday. So at the moment the property is located within the rural residential zone and it occurs at an existing shed at the property located in the northwest corner of the property. So the shed is located approximately 15 metres from the road frontage and is accessed by one driveway battle axe handle to the rear of the site. Upon review of the relevant sort of matters and impacts relevant to the site, this would involve an additional two car parking entrance, two vehicle car parks. Movements vehicle movements in the morning to access the rear of the site to undertake the assistance of the shed and then the leaving of the property in a total of four traffic movements per day at the site. Upon review of the application requested changes, it is recommended that the changes be approved. And that the two additional staff members be allowed between the hours the applicant has also requested an extension of a lapsing date, which is relevant to the site as well. Council had originally conditioned that the approval. Be reviewed after a two-year period, and that was applicable to the 17th of December last year. That was requested by the applicant to be removed from the approval. The removal of that condition is not recommended, but extended for an additional two-year so on a four-year basis. Up until 2029, but that's right.
1 suggested discussion start time
  • 67.0 seconds on the council source timeline · Recording time not yet verified. The end of the discussion is not yet confirmed.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.