Skip to the record
Beware of cheap imitations.
Item 7.2.6.2026-11-10 · General CommitteeOfficial item record

MCU25/0053.01 & OPW25/0074.01 - 7 Noosa Pde, Noosa Heads - Other Change To Dwelling House

← Meeting agenda & transcript

See the votes on this matter →

What was decided?

The minuted decision sequence

No separately labelled carried Council Resolution has been identified here. Read each formal event and the complete item minutes; a lost motion is not necessarily the final outcome.

1Committee RecommendationCarried

Moved: Jessica Phillips · Seconded: Amelia Lorentson

That Council 

A. Note the report by the Development Planner to the General Committee Meeting dated 10 November 2026 regarding applications MCU25/0053.01 and OPW25/0074.01 for an Other Change to a Development Permit for Material Change of Use - Dwelling House (Basement) and Operational Works (Excavation) situated at 7 Noosa Parade, Noosa Heads Qld 4567;

B. Approve the application in accordance with the proposed conditions outlined in Attachment 1; and 

C. Note the report is provided in accordance with Section 63(5) of the Planning Act 2016.

Carried.

Against 0 named

No names recorded on this side.

Official minutes · section 1

Read complete item-specific minutes
Committee Recommendation
Moved:Cr Jessica Phillips
Seconded:Cr Amelia Lorentson

That Council 

  1. Note the report by the Development Planner to the General Committee Meeting dated 10 November 2026 regarding applications MCU25/0053.01 and OPW25/0074.01 for an Other Change to a Development Permit for Material Change of Use - Dwelling House (Basement) and Operational Works (Excavation) situated at 7 Noosa Parade, Noosa Heads Qld 4567;

  2. Approve the application in accordance with the proposed conditions outlined in Attachment 1; and 

  3. Note the report is provided in accordance with Section 63(5) of the Planning Act 2016.

Carried.
 For:Cr Brian Stockwell, Cr Karen Finzel, Cr Amelia Lorentson, Cr Jessica Phillips, Cr Frank Wilkie, Cr Nicola Wilson
 Against:None

This summary follows this item’s minutes. The established voting totals use their existing method while differences are checked against the full records.

What was said?

Named discussion on NoosaWatch TV

These actual transcript passages match the item’s wording. The start and end of the item’s discussion are not yet confirmed; these excerpts are not measured item airtime or exact decision moments.

Delegation so if I could just expand on that it's a application that was applied from 2025 so quite recently and at that recently time and at that time the version of the Planning Scheme had a house as being a consistent use within the medium density residential zone and with the most recent changes to the Planning Scheme that is now an inconsistent use in the zone so we've got a very recent approval for a dwelling house approved at a time when it was consistent and they're more seeking to make changes to that development and when we look at the definition of minor change one of the aspects that needs to be adhered to is that public notification would not be required if public notification was not initially required and the application now would require notification and didn't require notification and there was no submissions because of that change from a consistent use to an inconsistent use so we have to look at the application through the lens of the current Planning Scheme and what it would trigger um in terms of level of assessment when that change is applied for as if the whole development would have been made so I'm hoping that's not having complicated things for you by explaining that but that's the reason why we're here today as they are very minor and inconsequential changes designed it's essentially a process issue and our delegation is are requiring it to come back to Council. I've had some initial conversations with Diana and we'll continue to have conversations around potential changes to the delegations to recommend changes to the delegations to Council to consider whether these items should not come before you in the future. I'm trying to find so question I a tried.
That's correct. They'll still have to go through the same process where they might be considered a minor change. They will still be considered another change and require notification, but they would not be required to come back to Council for these very minor matters. So around the same time there was changes to the Planning Act where previously a house in the medium and high density residential zone could not require a Material Change of Use, so we couldn't make it consistent or inconsistent on that basis. There's been a change in the Planning Act so that those zones, a dwelling house now can be in consistent use and it's part of a most much recent change. To the planning schemes, Council has effectively taken that approach in those zones, obviously to try and accommodate more dwellings in the zones that are designed to accommodate them.
1 suggested discussion start time
  • 12619.0 seconds on the council source timeline · Recording time not yet verified. The end of the discussion is not yet confirmed.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.